remove(client): Remove blocking client support (#123) #124
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent changes reflect a significant transition from blocking to asynchronous operations within the Rust project. Dependencies and functionalities related to blocking I/O have been removed, streamlining the codebase and emphasizing non-blocking practices. This shift simplifies the API and documentation, encouraging users to adopt modern asynchronous programming paradigms while enhancing overall usability and maintainability. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant AsyncClient as Client
participant Server
User->>Client: Send Async Request
Client->>Server: Forward Request
Server-->>Client: Return Response
Client-->>User: Deliver Response
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (2)
src/client/mod.rs (1)
7-7: Further Refactoring Required forDecoderRemovalThe
Decoderis still used insrc/client/response.rsand defined insrc/client/decoder.rs. Its removal from the public export list has not been fully integrated into the codebase. Further refactoring is needed to replace or remove its usage to align with the intended change. No documentation updates are necessary as there are no references toDecoderin markdown files.
- Files to address:
src/client/response.rssrc/client/decoder.rsAnalysis chain
Verify the impact of removing
Decoder.The removal of
Decoderfrom the public export list suggests a shift away from blocking operations. Ensure that any dependent code or documentation is updated to reflect this change.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of removing `Decoder` from the public export list. # Test: Search for the usage of `Decoder` in the codebase. Expect: No remaining dependencies on `Decoder`. rg --type rust 'Decoder'Length of output: 4051
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for references to `Decoder` in the documentation files. rg --type markdown 'Decoder' # Check for any remaining uses of `Decoder` outside of `src/client/response.rs`. rg --type rust 'Decoder' --glob '!src/client/response.rs'Length of output: 3754
src/lib.rs (1)
10-10: Review SOCKS5 blocking IO support for consistency with asynchronous focus.The documentation now emphasizes asynchronous clients, but there are still parts of the codebase, particularly in
src/proxy.rs, that rely on blocking IO for SOCKS5 support. Consider reviewing this to ensure it aligns with the project's overall asynchronous direction.
src/proxy.rs: Mentions blocking IO for SOCKS5 support.Analysis chain
Verify the impact of documentation changes.
The documentation has been updated to focus on asynchronous clients. Ensure that this change aligns with the overall project direction and does not leave out any critical information for users.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if the documentation changes align with the project's shift towards asynchronous clients. # Test: Check for references to blocking clients in the documentation. Expect: No outdated references. rg --type rust -A 5 'blocking'Length of output: 944
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for additional documentation or comments related to blocking IO and asynchronous operations. # Search for comments or documentation that mention blocking IO in the codebase. rg --type rust -A 5 'blocking IO'Length of output: 639
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (12)
- Cargo.toml (3 hunks)
- README.md (1 hunks)
- src/client/body.rs (1 hunks)
- src/client/decoder.rs (1 hunks)
- src/client/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- src/client/response.rs (1 hunks)
- src/lib.rs (5 hunks)
- src/tls/builder.rs (1 hunks)
- src/tls/settings.rs (1 hunks)
- tests/multipart.rs (1 hunks)
- tests/redirect.rs (1 hunks)
- tests/timeouts.rs (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (6)
- Cargo.toml
- README.md
- src/client/decoder.rs
- src/tls/settings.rs
- tests/redirect.rs
- tests/timeouts.rs
Additional comments not posted (4)
tests/multipart.rs (1)
Line range hint
1-1:
Verify test coverage for multipart functionality.The removal of the
blocking_file_partfunction indicates a shift towards asynchronous testing. Ensure that the remaining tests provide comprehensive coverage for multipart functionality.Verification successful
Comprehensive Asynchronous Test Coverage for Multipart Functionality Verified
The
tests/multipart.rsfile contains asynchronous tests such astext_partandstream_part, which indicate comprehensive coverage of multipart functionality using async operations. This aligns with the removal of blocking functions and supports the shift towards asynchronous testing.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify test coverage for multipart functionality. # Test: Search for tests related to multipart functionality. Expect: Comprehensive coverage without relying on blocking operations. rg --type rust 'multipart'Length of output: 2237
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for asynchronous tests in `tests/multipart.rs` to verify comprehensive coverage of multipart functionality. # Test: Look for async tests in the multipart test file. rg --type rust 'async fn' tests/multipart.rs -A 5Length of output: 411
src/client/body.rs (1)
Line range hint
44-44:
Verify the impact of removing thewrapfunction.The removal of the
wrapfunction indicates a shift away from supporting blocking behavior. Ensure that any dependent code or documentation is updated to reflect this change.Verification successful
No Impact from Removing
wrapFunctionThe removal of the
wrapfunction from theBodyimplementation does not impact other parts of the codebase or documentation. There are no dependencies or references that require updates.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of removing the `wrap` function from the `Body` implementation. # Test: Search for the usage of the `wrap` function in the codebase. Expect: No remaining dependencies on `wrap`. rg --type rust 'wrap\('Length of output: 14413
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for any references to `wrap` in comments or documentation files. # Test: Search for the keyword `wrap` in comments and markdown files to find any related documentation or comments. rg 'wrap' --type md --type rustLength of output: 18878
src/tls/builder.rs (1)
3-3: Verify the impact of the import path change.The import path for
HttpVersionPrefhas been changed. Ensure that this change does not affect other parts of the codebase that rely on the previous path.Verification successful
Import Path Change Verified
The import path change for
HttpVersionPreftouse crate::client::client::HttpVersionPref;insrc/tls/builder.rsis consistent with the usage across the codebase. No broken references were found.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `HttpVersionPref` across the codebase to ensure the import path change does not break any references. # Test: Search for the usage of `HttpVersionPref`. Expect: No broken references due to the path change. rg --type rust -A 5 'HttpVersionPref'Length of output: 6441
src/lib.rs (1)
418-423: Verify the impact of module export changes.The module exports have been restructured to focus on the
clientmodule. Ensure that this change does not break any existing code that relied on the previous module structure.Also applies to: 432-432
Verification successful
Module Export Changes Verified
The restructuring of module exports in
src/lib.rsdoes not appear to break any existing code. The search results show that the affected modules and types, such asmultipartandwebsocket, are being used correctly in various parts of the codebase, including tests and examples, without any broken references.
- References Found:
multipartis used intests/multipart.rsandsrc/client/request.rs.websocketand related types likeMessageandCloseCodeare used inexamples/websocket.rsandsrc/client/websocket.No issues were found related to broken references due to the changes in module exports.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if the module export changes affect existing code. # Test: Search for the usage of affected modules. Expect: No broken references due to the module restructuring. rg --type rust -A 5 'async_impl'Length of output: 32
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if the module export changes affect existing code. # Test: Search for the usage of affected modules and types. Expect: No broken references due to the module restructuring. rg --type rust -A 5 'multipart|websocket|CloseCode|Message|WebSocket|WebSocketRequestBuilder|WebSocketResponse'Length of output: 39622
0x676e67
changed the title
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Tests