Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Try sorting users list by email or username #41623

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: trunk
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

tellthemachines
Copy link
Contributor

@tellthemachines tellthemachines commented Feb 7, 2025

Proposed changes:

When the output of the users list endpoint includes viewers, make it possible to sort by login or email.

This is needed to display viewers in the wp-admin/users.php view, as part of Automattic/wp-calypso#98386.

Other information:

  • Have you written new tests for your changes, if applicable?
  • Have you checked the E2E test CI results, and verified that your changes do not break them?
  • Have you tested your changes on WordPress.com, if applicable (if so, you'll see a generated comment below with a script to run)?

Jetpack product discussion

Does this pull request change what data or activity we track or use?

Testing instructions:

  • Should be tested in conjunction with 171239-ghe-Automattic/wpcom
  • Go to /wp-admin/users.php on a simple site. Make sure classic view is enabled!
  • Try clicking on "username" and "email" buttons at the top of the users table:
Screenshot 2025-02-12 at 11 33 25 am
  • Verify that list of users is reordered accordingly.

@tellthemachines tellthemachines self-assigned this Feb 7, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 7, 2025

Are you an Automattician? Please test your changes on all WordPress.com environments to help mitigate accidental explosions.

  • To test on WoA, go to the Plugins menu on a WordPress.com Simple site. Click on the "Upload" button and follow the upgrade flow to be able to upload, install, and activate the Jetpack Beta plugin. Once the plugin is active, go to Jetpack > Jetpack Beta, select your plugin, and enable the try/order-with-viewers-in-users-list-endpoint branch.

  • To test on Simple, run the following command on your sandbox:

    bin/jetpack-downloader test jetpack try/order-with-viewers-in-users-list-endpoint
    

Interested in more tips and information?

  • In your local development environment, use the jetpack rsync command to sync your changes to a WoA dev blog.
  • Read more about our development workflow here: PCYsg-eg0-p2
  • Figure out when your changes will be shipped to customers here: PCYsg-eg5-p2

@github-actions github-actions bot added [Feature] WPCOM API [Plugin] Jetpack Issues about the Jetpack plugin. https://wordpress.org/plugins/jetpack/ [Status] In Progress labels Feb 7, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 7, 2025

Thank you for your PR!

When contributing to Jetpack, we have a few suggestions that can help us test and review your patch:

  • ✅ Include a description of your PR changes.
  • ✅ Add a "[Status]" label (In Progress, Needs Team Review, ...).
  • ✅ Add a "[Type]" label (Bug, Enhancement, Janitorial, Task).
  • ✅ Add testing instructions.
  • ✅ Specify whether this PR includes any changes to data or privacy.
  • ✅ Add changelog entries to affected projects

This comment will be updated as you work on your PR and make changes. If you think that some of those checks are not needed for your PR, please explain why you think so. Thanks for cooperation 🤖


The e2e test report can be found here. Please note that it can take a few minutes after the e2e tests checks are complete for the report to be available.


Follow this PR Review Process:

  1. Ensure all required checks appearing at the bottom of this PR are passing.
  2. Choose a review path based on your changes:
    • A. Team Review: add the "[Status] Needs Team Review" label
      • For most changes, including minor cross-team impacts.
      • Example: Updating a team-specific component or a small change to a shared library.
    • B. Crew Review: add the "[Status] Needs Review" label
      • For significant changes to core functionality.
      • Example: Major updates to a shared library or complex features.
    • C. Both: Start with Team, then request Crew
      • For complex changes or when you need extra confidence.
      • Example: Refactor affecting multiple systems.
  3. Get at least one approval before merging.

Still unsure? Reach out in #jetpack-developers for guidance!


Jetpack plugin:

The Jetpack plugin has different release cadences depending on the platform:

  • WordPress.com Simple releases happen semi-continuously (PCYsg-Jjm-p2).
  • WoA releases happen weekly.
  • Releases to self-hosted sites happen monthly. The next release is scheduled for none scheduled (scheduled code freeze on undefined).

If you have any questions about the release process, please ask in the #jetpack-releases channel on Slack.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the [Status] Needs Author Reply We would need you to make some changes or provide some more details about your PR. Thank you! label Feb 7, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 7, 2025

Code Coverage Summary

Coverage changed in 1 file.

File Coverage Δ% Δ Uncovered
projects/plugins/jetpack/json-endpoints/class.wpcom-json-api-list-users-endpoint.php 0/150 (0.00%) 0.00% 8 💔

Full summary · PHP report · JS report

Add label I don't care about code coverage for this PR Use this label to ignore the check for insufficient code coveage. to override the failing coverage check.

@tellthemachines tellthemachines added the [Type] Enhancement Changes to an existing feature — removing, adding, or changing parts of it label Feb 12, 2025
@tellthemachines tellthemachines marked this pull request as ready for review February 12, 2025 04:45
@tellthemachines tellthemachines added [Status] Needs Team Review and removed [Status] Needs Author Reply We would need you to make some changes or provide some more details about your PR. Thank you! labels Feb 12, 2025
@tellthemachines
Copy link
Contributor Author

Question re the code coverage failure: are there tests for this endpoint anywhere? I couldn't find any in the PHP tests folder. Should I be looking somewhere else?

@jeherve
Copy link
Member

jeherve commented Feb 13, 2025

Question re the code coverage failure: are there tests for this endpoint anywhere? I couldn't find any in the PHP tests folder. Should I be looking somewhere else?

There are no tests for that endpoint yet, no. You'd find that file in projects/plugins/jetpack/tests/php/json-api/ if one existed.

You could create your own though :)

@ramonjd
Copy link
Member

ramonjd commented Feb 13, 2025

There are no tests for that endpoint yet, no. You'd find that file in projects/plugins/jetpack/tests/php/json-api/ if one existed.
You could create your own though :)

If it helps I created a basic test over in https://github.com/Automattic/jetpack/pull/41707/files. The test doesn't actually relate to my PR but I thought I'd add it coz it was missing.

Probably easier to move it to this PR?

@tellthemachines
Copy link
Contributor Author

Probably easier to move it to this PR?

If yours isn't close to being ready I guess we could do that! Then I can add maybe add a test for the behaviour in this PR.

Copy link

Code Coverage Summary

Coverage changed in 3 files.

File Coverage Δ% Δ Uncovered
projects/plugins/jetpack/class.json-api.php 35/451 (7.76%) 0.89% -4 💚
projects/plugins/jetpack/class.json-api-endpoints.php 250/1258 (19.87%) 0.87% -11 💚
projects/plugins/jetpack/json-endpoints/class.wpcom-json-api-list-users-endpoint.php 57/150 (38.00%) 38.00% -49 💚

Full summary · PHP report · JS report

if ( 'desc' === strtolower( $order ) ) {
return gmp_neg( strcmp( strtolower( $a->{$orderby} ), strtolower( $b->{$orderby} ) ) );
}
return strcmp( strtolower( $a->{$orderby} ), strtolower( $b->{$orderby} ) );
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks like this is the only way we can do it.

As a follow up, I also think we need to dedupe the combined array for users that are both Viewers and something else. See: #28317 (comment)

Going forward, it might be an idea to remove the Viewer role when a user changes roles. I'm not sure since the Viewer role is special - an Editor might still want to be a Viewer so they can preview the private site, if that's the way it works 🤷🏻

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pretty sure any role can preview a private site. I've spent a lot of testing time creating wordpress.com accounts for all my alt emails and adding them to several of my private sites 😂

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You're right. I think we should immediately revoke the Viewer status when a Viewer's role changes

Mentioned in pdgR5j-1dB-p2

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
[Feature] WPCOM API [Plugin] Jetpack Issues about the Jetpack plugin. https://wordpress.org/plugins/jetpack/ [Status] In Progress [Status] Needs Team Review [Tests] Includes Tests [Type] Enhancement Changes to an existing feature — removing, adding, or changing parts of it
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants