Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 24, 2023. It is now read-only.

Feature: Arrow keys in Task Select filter #338

Open
wants to merge 8 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

lingo
Copy link

@lingo lingo commented Sep 4, 2018

Working on Linux, to allow use of vertical arrow keys within
filter to select within the treeView.

This means if there are several tasks shown from the filter,
you can select the relevant task without moving from the lineedit box.

I'm not sure how this works for OSX however as I believe the vertical
arrow keys act as Home/End.

I've submitted the pull request as a (partially) implemented feature request.

krf and others added 3 commits April 11, 2018 09:04
Change-Id: Ie12a64754473e3ed1cfaeb0b723d8f9e55484216
Change-Id: I3751d0b588cfda79324f77f6e7cdd44ebc8307e1
Working on Linux, to allow use of vertical arrow keys within
filter to select within the treeView.

This means if there are several tasks shown from the filter,
you can select the relevant task without moving from the lineedit box.

I'm not sure how this works for OSX however as I believe the vertical
arrow keys act as Home/End.
dfaure and others added 5 commits October 1, 2018 08:25
The JPEG image in that dialog takes some memory, no point in having it
loaded at all times. Found by using heaptrack.

Change-Id: Ia3ec8ed6c0fca42e1b2e161b16f481a36dc2eefa
Reviewed-on: https://codereview.kdab.com/61650
Tested-by: Continuous Integration <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Frank Osterfeld <[email protected]>
Working on Linux, to allow use of vertical arrow keys within
filter to select within the treeView.

This means if there are several tasks shown from the filter,
you can select the relevant task without moving from the lineedit box.

I'm not sure how this works for OSX however as I believe the vertical
arrow keys act as Home/End.
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants