added storage interface to scope data by tab #138
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@bkd705 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 4 minutes and 22 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughWalkthroughThe recent updates to the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant App
participant Storage
User->>App: Trigger action (e.g., save)
App->>Storage: setItem(data)
Storage-->>App: Confirmation
App-->>User: Action completed
sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant App
participant Storage
User->>App: Request data
App->>Storage: getItem(key)
Storage-->>App: Return data
App-->>User: Display data
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (13)
- apps/mocksi-lite/background.ts (5 hunks)
- apps/mocksi-lite/common/Popup/Draggable.tsx (3 hunks)
- apps/mocksi-lite/content/AppStateContext.tsx (3 hunks)
- apps/mocksi-lite/content/ContentApp.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/mocksi-lite/content/EditMode/editMode.ts (2 hunks)
- apps/mocksi-lite/content/ListPopup/DemoItem.tsx (3 hunks)
- apps/mocksi-lite/content/Storage.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/mocksi-lite/content/Toast/ChatToast.tsx (3 hunks)
- apps/mocksi-lite/content/Toast/EditToast.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/mocksi-lite/content/content.tsx (5 hunks)
- apps/mocksi-lite/mckSocket.ts (2 hunks)
- apps/mocksi-lite/networking.ts (2 hunks)
- apps/mocksi-lite/utils.ts (4 hunks)
Additional context used
Learnings (2)
apps/mocksi-lite/utils.ts (1)
Learnt from: nicolaschapur PR: Mocksi/HARlighter#80 File: apps/mocksi-lite/content/content.tsx:43-93 Timestamp: 2024-06-28T15:36:05.992Z Learning: The `getRecordingsStorage` function in `utils.ts` returns an empty array when `recordings` is undefined or null, ensuring robustness in downstream function calls.apps/mocksi-lite/background.ts (1)
Learnt from: nicolaschapur PR: Mocksi/HARlighter#80 File: apps/mocksi-lite/content/content.tsx:43-93 Timestamp: 2024-06-28T15:36:05.992Z Learning: The `getRecordingsStorage` function in `utils.ts` returns an empty array when `recordings` is undefined or null, ensuring robustness in downstream function calls.
Biome
apps/mocksi-lite/content/Storage.tsx
[error] 29-29: Avoid the use of spread (
...) syntax on accumulators.Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in
.reduce) because it causes a time complexity ofO(n^2).
Consider methods such as .splice or .push instead.(lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread)
Additional comments not posted (37)
apps/mocksi-lite/content/ListPopup/DemoItem.tsx (2)
Line range hint
29-33:
LGTM: Modular storage approach.The transition to using
Storage.setItemenhances modularity and maintainability.
Line range hint
38-42:
LGTM: Modular storage approach.The transition to using
Storage.setItemenhances modularity and maintainability.apps/mocksi-lite/networking.ts (1)
73-75: LGTM: Modular storage approach.The transition to using
Storage.setItemfor handling unauthorized access enhances modularity and maintainability.apps/mocksi-lite/content/Storage.tsx (6)
37-58: LGTM: Proper error handling insetItem.The method correctly handles errors and logs them, enhancing robustness.
59-73: LGTM: Proper error handling inremoveItem.The method correctly handles errors and logs them, enhancing robustness.
74-88: LGTM: Proper error handling inclearTab.The method correctly handles errors and logs them, enhancing robustness.
89-93: LGTM: Simplicity ingetStorageForTab.The method is straightforward and effectively retrieves storage data for a tab.
94-102: LGTM: Proper error handling insetStorageForTab.The method correctly handles errors and logs them, enhancing robustness.
103-116: LGTM: Robustness ingetTabId.The method effectively retrieves the current active tab ID and handles edge cases.
apps/mocksi-lite/content/ContentApp.tsx (2)
20-20: Import statement forStoragelooks good.The import path for the
Storagemodule is correct and aligns with the changes described in the summary.
61-61: Usage ofStorage.setItemis appropriate.The transition from
chrome.storage.local.settoStorage.setItemaligns with the goal of encapsulating storage logic. Ensure thatStorage.setItemis correctly implemented to handle the data as expected.apps/mocksi-lite/content/content.tsx (5)
19-19: Import statement forStoragelooks good.The import path for the
Storagemodule is correct and aligns with the changes described in the summary.
53-54: Usage ofStorage.getItemis appropriate.The transition from
chrome.storage.local.gettoStorage.getItemaligns with the goal of encapsulating storage logic. Ensure thatStorage.getItemis correctly implemented to retrieve data as expected.
62-62: Usage ofStorage.setItemis appropriate.The transition from
chrome.storage.local.settoStorage.setItemaligns with the goal of encapsulating storage logic. Ensure thatStorage.setItemis correctly implemented to store data as expected.
125-125: Usage ofStorage.setItemin message event listener is appropriate.The transition from
chrome.storage.local.settoStorage.setItemwithin the message event listener aligns with the goal of encapsulating storage logic. Ensure thatStorage.setItemis correctly implemented to store data as expected.
130-130: Usage ofStorage.getItemin message event listener is appropriate.The transition from
chrome.storage.local.gettoStorage.getItemwithin the message event listener aligns with the goal of encapsulating storage logic. Ensure thatStorage.getItemis correctly implemented to retrieve data as expected.apps/mocksi-lite/common/Popup/Draggable.tsx (3)
3-3: Import statement forStoragelooks good.The import path for the
Storagemodule is correct and aligns with the changes described in the summary.
33-33: Usage ofStorage.setIteminpersistTransformis appropriate.The transition from
chrome.storage.local.settoStorage.setItemaligns with the goal of encapsulating storage logic. Ensure thatStorage.setItemis correctly implemented to store data as expected.
103-103: Usage ofStorage.getItemininitFromStorageis appropriate.The transition from
chrome.storage.local.gettoStorage.getItemaligns with the goal of encapsulating storage logic. Ensure thatStorage.getItemis correctly implemented to retrieve data as expected.apps/mocksi-lite/mckSocket.ts (1)
93-99: Good use of async/await for storage operations.The transition to async/await enhances readability and error handling. The implementation aligns well with modern JavaScript practices.
apps/mocksi-lite/content/EditMode/editMode.ts (2)
177-179: Simplified state management withStorage.setItem.The use of
Storage.setItemfor setting the read-only state abstracts the storage mechanism, enhancing maintainability.
184-186: Consistent use ofStorage.setItemfor state management.The function aligns with the modular approach to storage management, similar to
applyReadOnlyMode.apps/mocksi-lite/content/AppStateContext.tsx (2)
110-112: Encapsulation of storage logic withStorage.setItem.The middleware effectively uses
Storage.setItemfor state persistence, enhancing modularity and testability.
125-131: Improved readability with promise-based state loading.The
useEffecthook's use ofStorage.getItemfor asynchronous state loading enhances readability and error handling.apps/mocksi-lite/content/Toast/ChatToast.tsx (3)
9-9: Importing theStoragemodule.The import of the
Storagemodule is correctly added. Ensure that theStoragemodule is well-tested and properly handles all edge cases.
47-50: UsingStorage.getItemfor state retrieval.The transition to
Storage.getItemfromchrome.storage.local.getis well-implemented. This change encapsulates storage logic and improves modularity.
210-213: UsingStorage.setItemfor state update.The transition to
Storage.setItemfromchrome.storage.local.setis well-implemented. This change aligns with the modular approach for managing storage operations.apps/mocksi-lite/content/Toast/EditToast.tsx (2)
30-30: Importing theStoragemodule.The import of the
Storagemodule is correctly added. Ensure that theStoragemodule is well-tested and properly handles all edge cases.
Line range hint
119-124:
UsingStorage.getItemfor read-only state retrieval.The transition to
Storage.getItemfromchrome.storage.local.getis well-implemented. This change encapsulates storage logic and improves modularity.apps/mocksi-lite/utils.ts (6)
21-21: Importing theStoragemodule.The import of the
Storagemodule is correctly added. Ensure that theStoragemodule is well-tested and properly handles all edge cases.
330-332: UsingStorage.getItemingetLastPageDom.The transition to
Storage.getItemfromchrome.storage.local.getis well-implemented. This change encapsulates storage logic and improves modularity.
365-368: UsingStorage.getItemingetAlterations.The transition to
Storage.getItemfromchrome.storage.local.getis well-implemented. This change encapsulates storage logic and improves modularity.
Line range hint
373-379:
UsingStorage.getItemingetRecordingsStorage.The transition to
Storage.getItemfromchrome.storage.local.getis well-implemented. Ensure that the JSON parsing handles all edge cases, such as malformed JSON.
401-403: UsingStorage.setIteminupdateRecordingsStorage.The transition to
Storage.setItemfromchrome.storage.local.setis well-implemented. This change aligns with the modular approach for managing storage operations.
408-409: UsingStorage.getIteminloadRecordingId.The transition to
Storage.getItemfromchrome.storage.local.getis well-implemented. This change encapsulates storage logic and improves modularity.apps/mocksi-lite/background.ts (2)
196-216: Verify the function signature change.The
handleChatResponsefunction was previouslyasync, but now it is not. This might be a mistake, as the function still performs asynchronous operations usingawait.
Line range hint
339-353:
LGTM! But verify the usage of theStoragemodule.The code changes are approved.
Ensure that the
Storagemodule is correctly implemented and used elsewhere in the codebase.Verification successful
Storage Module Usage Verified
The
Storagemodule is implemented inapps/mocksi-lite/content/Storage.tsxand is used across multiple files in the codebase. This confirms that it is correctly integrated and utilized for storage operations. No issues were found with its usage.
- Implementation:
apps/mocksi-lite/content/Storage.tsx- Usage: Various files including
networking.ts,mckSocket.ts,utils.ts,background.ts, and others within thecontentdirectory.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation and usage of the `Storage` module. # Test: Search for the `Storage` module implementation and its usage across the codebase. rg --type javascript --type typescript $'Storage'Length of output: 83
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation and usage of the `Storage` module. # Test: Search for the `Storage` module implementation and its usage across the codebase using the correct file types. rg --type js --type ts 'Storage'Length of output: 6717
apps/mocksi-lite/content/Storage.tsx
Outdated
| return keys.reduce((acc, curr) => { | ||
| if (data[curr]) { | ||
| return { | ||
| ...acc, | ||
| [curr]: data[curr] | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return acc; | ||
| }, {}) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Optimize accumulator handling in getItem.
Avoid using spread syntax on accumulators in .reduce to prevent performance issues. Consider using methods like .push or .splice instead.
- return keys.reduce((acc, curr) => {
- if (data[curr]) {
- return {
- ...acc,
- [curr]: data[curr]
- }
- }
- return acc;
- }, {})
+ return keys.reduce((acc, curr) => {
+ if (data[curr]) {
+ acc[curr] = data[curr];
+ }
+ return acc;
+ }, {});Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| return keys.reduce((acc, curr) => { | |
| if (data[curr]) { | |
| return { | |
| ...acc, | |
| [curr]: data[curr] | |
| } | |
| } | |
| return acc; | |
| }, {}) | |
| return keys.reduce((acc, curr) => { | |
| if (data[curr]) { | |
| acc[curr] = data[curr]; | |
| } | |
| return acc; | |
| }, {}); |
Tools
Biome
[error] 29-29: Avoid the use of spread (
...) syntax on accumulators.Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in
.reduce) because it causes a time complexity ofO(n^2).
Consider methods such as .splice or .push instead.(lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (4)
- apps/mocksi-lite/background.ts (7 hunks)
- apps/mocksi-lite/content/Storage.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/mocksi-lite/content/content.tsx (5 hunks)
- apps/mocksi-lite/utils.ts (5 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- apps/mocksi-lite/content/content.tsx
- apps/mocksi-lite/utils.ts
Additional context used
Learnings (1)
apps/mocksi-lite/background.ts (1)
Learnt from: nicolaschapur PR: Mocksi/HARlighter#80 File: apps/mocksi-lite/content/content.tsx:43-93 Timestamp: 2024-06-28T15:36:05.992Z Learning: The `getRecordingsStorage` function in `utils.ts` returns an empty array when `recordings` is undefined or null, ensuring robustness in downstream function calls.
Biome
apps/mocksi-lite/content/Storage.tsx
[error] 33-33: Avoid the use of spread (
...) syntax on accumulators.Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in
.reduce) because it causes a time complexity ofO(n^2).
Consider methods such as .splice or .push instead.(lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread)
Additional comments not posted (9)
apps/mocksi-lite/content/Storage.tsx (7)
30-39: Optimize accumulator handling ingetItem.Avoid using spread syntax on accumulators in
.reduceto prevent performance issues. Consider using methods like.pushor.spliceinstead.- return keys.reduce((acc, curr) => { - if (data[curr]) { - return { - ...acc, - [curr]: data[curr] - } - } - return acc; - }, {}) + return keys.reduce((acc, curr) => { + if (data[curr]) { + acc[curr] = data[curr]; + } + return acc; + }, {});Tools
Biome
[error] 33-33: Avoid the use of spread (
...) syntax on accumulators.Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in
.reduce) because it causes a time complexity ofO(n^2).
Consider methods such as .splice or .push instead.(lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread)
41-64: LGTM: Proper error handling insetItem.The method correctly handles errors and logs them when setting local storage. The use of spread syntax to merge data is appropriate.
65-79: LGTM: Effective key removal inremoveItem.The method correctly removes a key from the storage and handles errors appropriately.
80-94: LGTM: Efficient clearing of tab data inclearTab.The method effectively clears all data for a tab and handles errors appropriately.
95-99: LGTM: Correct data retrieval ingetStorageForTab.The method correctly retrieves all data for a specified tab.
100-107: LGTM: Proper data setting insetStorageForTab.The method correctly sets data for a tab and handles errors appropriately.
109-131: LGTM: Effective tab ID retrieval ingetTabId.The method efficiently retrieves the current tab ID using asynchronous patterns.
apps/mocksi-lite/background.ts (2)
196-216: LGTM: Proper use of asynchronous storage inhandleChatResponse.The function effectively uses
Storage.getItemandStorage.setItemfor managing chat messages and handles errors appropriately.
339-355: LGTM: Correct use of asynchronous storage ingetRecordings.The function effectively uses
Storage.setItemfor storing recordings and handles errors appropriately. The sorting of recordings before storage is a good practice.
apps/mocksi-lite/content/Storage.tsx
Outdated
| getTabId: () => Promise<string | null>; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| export const Storage: Storage = { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Let's do a couple changes here:
- Make Chrome.storage.local an Injectable Dependency
- Create an Unit test for this Storage object
- Assert in the unit tests that data is getting stored in the right tabId, and in the right key
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
apps/mocksi-lite/background.ts (1)
Line range hint
424-434: Resolve merge conflict markers.There are unresolved merge conflict markers in the code. These need to be addressed to ensure the code compiles and functions correctly.
<<<<<<< HEAD const result = await Storage.getItem([MOCKSI_RECORDING_ID]) return result[MOCKSI_RECORDING_ID] ======= return new Promise<undefined | string>((resolve) => { chrome.storage.local.get([MOCKSI_RECORDING_ID], (result) => { resolve(result[MOCKSI_RECORDING_ID]); }); }); >>>>>>> main
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (6)
- apps/mocksi-lite/background.ts (7 hunks)
- apps/mocksi-lite/content/ContentApp.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/mocksi-lite/content/ListPopup/DemoItem.tsx (3 hunks)
- apps/mocksi-lite/content/Toast/EditToast.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/mocksi-lite/content/content.tsx (5 hunks)
- apps/mocksi-lite/utils.ts (5 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- apps/mocksi-lite/content/ListPopup/DemoItem.tsx
- apps/mocksi-lite/content/Toast/EditToast.tsx
- apps/mocksi-lite/content/content.tsx
Additional context used
Learnings (2)
apps/mocksi-lite/utils.ts (1)
Learnt from: nicolaschapur PR: Mocksi/HARlighter#80 File: apps/mocksi-lite/content/content.tsx:43-93 Timestamp: 2024-06-28T15:36:05.992Z Learning: The `getRecordingsStorage` function in `utils.ts` returns an empty array when `recordings` is undefined or null, ensuring robustness in downstream function calls.apps/mocksi-lite/background.ts (1)
Learnt from: nicolaschapur PR: Mocksi/HARlighter#80 File: apps/mocksi-lite/content/content.tsx:43-93 Timestamp: 2024-06-28T15:36:05.992Z Learning: The `getRecordingsStorage` function in `utils.ts` returns an empty array when `recordings` is undefined or null, ensuring robustness in downstream function calls.
Biome
apps/mocksi-lite/utils.ts
[error] 297-299: Expected a statement but instead found '<<<<<<< HEAD
console.log('trying', message, body)'.Expected a statement here.
(parse)
[error] 307-309: Expected a statement but instead found '=======
chrome.runtime.sendMessage('.Expected a statement here.
(parse)
[error] 309-309: Expected a statement but instead found ', (response) =>'.
Expected a statement here.
(parse)
[error] 314-317: Expected a statement but instead found '>>>>>>> main
callback(response)'.Expected a statement here.
(parse)
[error] 318-318: Expected a statement but instead found 'catch (error)'.
Expected a statement here.
(parse)
[error] 424-425: Expected a statement but instead found '<<<<<<< HEAD'.
Expected a statement here.
(parse)
[error] 428-428: Expected an expression but instead found '==='.
Expected an expression here.
(parse)
[error] 428-428: Expected an expression but instead found '='.
Expected an expression here.
(parse)
[error] 427-428: Invalid assignment to
result[MOCKSI_RECORDING_ID] ======This expression cannot be assigned to
(parse)
[error] 429-429: Expected an expression, or an assignment but instead found 'return'.
Expected an expression, or an assignment here.
(parse)
[error] 433-434: Expected a statement but instead found '>>>>>>> main'.
Expected a statement here.
(parse)
Additional comments not posted (11)
apps/mocksi-lite/content/ContentApp.tsx (2)
20-20: Import of Storage module.The import statement for the
Storagemodule is correctly added. This change is essential for transitioning from the Chrome storage API to a custom storage solution.
63-63: Use of Storage.setItem.The transition from
chrome.storage.local.settoStorage.setItemis well-implemented, promoting modularity and encapsulation of storage logic.apps/mocksi-lite/utils.ts (5)
21-21: Import of Storage module.The import statement for the
Storagemodule is correctly added, aligning with the new storage management strategy.
343-343: Use of Storage.getItem in getLastPageDom.The change from
chrome.storage.local.gettoStorage.getItemis correctly implemented, enhancing maintainability and consistency.
378-378: Use of Storage.getItem in getAlterations.The transition to
Storage.getItemis well-executed, ensuring consistency in storage access patterns.
386-386: Use of Storage.getItem in getRecordingsStorage.The refactor to use
Storage.getItemimproves code clarity and encapsulates storage logic effectively.
418-418: Use of Storage.setItem in updateRecordingsStorage.The change from
chrome.storage.local.settoStorage.setItemaligns with the new storage strategy, promoting modularity.apps/mocksi-lite/background.ts (4)
13-13: Import of Storage module.The import statement for the
Storagemodule is correctly added, facilitating the shift to a more modular storage management system.
196-216: Use of Storage methods in handleChatResponse.The transition to
Storage.getItemandStorage.setItemimproves the readability and maintainability of the code by using a consistent asynchronous pattern.
340-356: Use of Storage.setItem in getRecordings.The change to use
Storage.setItemaligns with the new storage strategy, enhancing code clarity and encapsulation.
480-480: Use of Storage.setItem in setPlayMode.The use of
Storage.setItemis consistent with the new storage management approach, promoting modularity.
apps/mocksi-lite/utils.ts
Outdated
| <<<<<<< HEAD | ||
| const result = await Storage.getItem([MOCKSI_RECORDING_ID]) | ||
| return result[MOCKSI_RECORDING_ID] | ||
| ======= |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Resolve merge conflict markers.
There are unresolved merge conflict markers in the code. These need to be addressed to ensure the code compiles and functions correctly.
<<<<<<< HEAD
const result = await Storage.getItem([MOCKSI_RECORDING_ID])
return result[MOCKSI_RECORDING_ID]
=======
return new Promise<undefined | string>((resolve) => {
chrome.storage.local.get([MOCKSI_RECORDING_ID], (result) => {
resolve(result[MOCKSI_RECORDING_ID]);
});
});
>>>>>>> mainCommittable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| <<<<<<< HEAD | |
| const result = await Storage.getItem([MOCKSI_RECORDING_ID]) | |
| return result[MOCKSI_RECORDING_ID] | |
| ======= | |
| return new Promise<undefined | string>((resolve) => { | |
| chrome.storage.local.get([MOCKSI_RECORDING_ID], (result) => { | |
| resolve(result[MOCKSI_RECORDING_ID]); | |
| }); | |
| }); |
Tools
Biome
[error] 428-428: Expected an expression but instead found '==='.
Expected an expression here.
(parse)
[error] 428-428: Expected an expression but instead found '='.
Expected an expression here.
(parse)
[error] 427-428: Invalid assignment to
result[MOCKSI_RECORDING_ID] ======This expression cannot be assigned to
(parse)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (4)
apps/mocksi-lite/content/ContentApp.tsx (1)
63-63: Ensure consistent error handling forStorage.setItemusage.While some instances of
Storage.setItemare wrapped in try-catch blocks to handle potential errors, others are not. To prevent unhandled exceptions and ensure robustness, please review and update all usages ofStorage.setItemto include appropriate error handling.
- Files with missing error handling:
apps/mocksi-lite/mckSocket.tsapps/mocksi-lite/networking.tsapps/mocksi-lite/background.ts(some instances)apps/mocksi-lite/content/content.tsxapps/mocksi-lite/content/AppStateContext.tsxapps/mocksi-lite/common/Popup/Draggable.tsxapps/mocksi-lite/content/Toast/ChatToast.tsxapps/mocksi-lite/content/ContentApp.tsxapps/mocksi-lite/content/EditMode/editMode.tsAnalysis chain
Transition to
Storage.setItemis consistent.The use of
Storage.setIteminstead ofchrome.storage.local.setis consistent with the move towards a more modular storage solution.Ensure that the
Storagemodule handles errors appropriately.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify correct usage of `Storage.setItem` across the codebase. # Test: Search for the usage of `Storage.setItem`. Expect: Correct implementation and error handling. rg --type javascript --type typescript -A 3 $'Storage.setItem'Length of output: 96
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify correct usage of `Storage.setItem` across the codebase. # Test: Search for the usage of `Storage.setItem`. Expect: Correct implementation and error handling. rg --type js --type ts -A 3 $'Storage.setItem'Length of output: 5217
apps/mocksi-lite/content/content.tsx (1)
70-70: Ensure Consistent Error Handling inStorageModule UsageWhile reviewing the usage of
Storage.getItemandStorage.setItem, I noticed that error handling is inconsistent across the codebase. Here are some areas where improvements can be made:
- apps/mocksi-lite/utils.ts: Lines where
Storage.getItemis used without explicit error handling.- apps/mocksi-lite/content/content.tsx: Instances of
Storage.getItemandStorage.setItemwithout try-catch blocks.- apps/mocksi-lite/content/AppStateContext.tsx: Consider adding error handling for
Storage.setItem.Please ensure that all asynchronous operations with the
Storagemodule include proper error handling to prevent potential issues.Analysis chain
Consistent use of
Storagemodule for state management.The use of
Storage.getItemandStorage.setItemthroughout the file maintains consistency with the new storage abstraction. This change enhances modularity and encapsulation of storage logic.Ensure that the
Storagemodule handles errors appropriately.Also applies to: 79-79, 93-93, 147-150
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify correct usage of `Storage.getItem` and `Storage.setItem` across the codebase. # Test: Search for the usage of `Storage.getItem` and `Storage.setItem`. Expect: Correct implementation and error handling. rg --type javascript --type typescript -A 3 $'Storage.getItem|Storage.setItem'Length of output: 114
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify correct usage of `Storage.getItem` and `Storage.setItem` across the codebase. # Test: Search for the usage of `Storage.getItem` and `Storage.setItem`. Expect: Correct implementation and error handling. rg --type js --type ts -A 3 'Storage.getItem|Storage.setItem'Length of output: 9087
apps/mocksi-lite/content/utils/Storage.tsx (2)
53-75: Consider using a logging library for better log management.The method handles errors well and uses console logs for debugging. For better control over log levels and output, consider using a logging library.
112-119: Consider using a logging library for better log management.The method handles errors well and uses console logs for debugging. For better control over log levels and output, consider using a logging library.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (14)
- apps/mocksi-lite/background.ts (7 hunks)
- apps/mocksi-lite/common/Popup/Draggable.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/mocksi-lite/content/AppStateContext.tsx (3 hunks)
- apps/mocksi-lite/content/ContentApp.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/mocksi-lite/content/EditMode/editMode.ts (2 hunks)
- apps/mocksi-lite/content/ListPopup/DemoItem.tsx (3 hunks)
- apps/mocksi-lite/content/Toast/ChatToast.tsx (3 hunks)
- apps/mocksi-lite/content/Toast/EditToast.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/mocksi-lite/content/content.tsx (6 hunks)
- apps/mocksi-lite/content/utils/Storage.test.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/mocksi-lite/content/utils/Storage.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/mocksi-lite/mckSocket.ts (2 hunks)
- apps/mocksi-lite/networking.ts (2 hunks)
- apps/mocksi-lite/utils.ts (5 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (8)
- apps/mocksi-lite/common/Popup/Draggable.tsx
- apps/mocksi-lite/content/AppStateContext.tsx
- apps/mocksi-lite/content/EditMode/editMode.ts
- apps/mocksi-lite/content/ListPopup/DemoItem.tsx
- apps/mocksi-lite/content/Toast/ChatToast.tsx
- apps/mocksi-lite/content/Toast/EditToast.tsx
- apps/mocksi-lite/mckSocket.ts
- apps/mocksi-lite/networking.ts
Additional context used
Learnings (2)
apps/mocksi-lite/utils.ts (1)
Learnt from: nicolaschapur PR: Mocksi/HARlighter#80 File: apps/mocksi-lite/content/content.tsx:43-93 Timestamp: 2024-06-28T15:36:05.992Z Learning: The `getRecordingsStorage` function in `utils.ts` returns an empty array when `recordings` is undefined or null, ensuring robustness in downstream function calls.apps/mocksi-lite/background.ts (1)
Learnt from: nicolaschapur PR: Mocksi/HARlighter#80 File: apps/mocksi-lite/content/content.tsx:43-93 Timestamp: 2024-06-28T15:36:05.992Z Learning: The `getRecordingsStorage` function in `utils.ts` returns an empty array when `recordings` is undefined or null, ensuring robustness in downstream function calls.
Biome
apps/mocksi-lite/content/utils/Storage.test.ts
[error] 31-31: Expected an expression, or an assignment but instead found '}'.
Expected an expression, or an assignment here.
(parse)
apps/mocksi-lite/content/utils/Storage.tsx
[error] 45-45: Avoid the use of spread (
...) syntax on accumulators.Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in
.reduce) because it causes a time complexity ofO(n^2).
Consider methods such as .splice or .push instead.(lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread)
apps/mocksi-lite/utils.ts
[error] 297-299: Expected a statement but instead found '<<<<<<< HEAD
console.log('trying', message, body)'.Expected a statement here.
(parse)
[error] 307-309: Expected a statement but instead found '=======
chrome.runtime.sendMessage(body, message , (response) =>'.Expected a statement here.
(parse)
[error] 314-317: Expected a statement but instead found '>>>>>>> main
callback(response)'.Expected a statement here.
(parse)
[error] 317-318: Expected a statement but instead found 'catch (error)
console.log('error time 2', error)'.Expected a statement here.
(parse)
[error] 422-423: Expected a statement but instead found '<<<<<<< HEAD'.
Expected a statement here.
(parse)
[error] 426-426: Expected an expression but instead found '==='.
Expected an expression here.
(parse)
[error] 426-426: Expected an expression but instead found '='.
Expected an expression here.
(parse)
[error] 425-426: Invalid assignment to
result[MOCKSI_RECORDING_ID] ======This expression cannot be assigned to
(parse)
[error] 427-427: Expected an expression, or an assignment but instead found 'return'.
Expected an expression, or an assignment here.
(parse)
[error] 431-432: Expected a statement but instead found '>>>>>>> main'.
Expected a statement here.
(parse)
Additional comments not posted (17)
apps/mocksi-lite/content/ContentApp.tsx (1)
20-20: Import ofStoragemodule is appropriate.The addition of the
Storageimport aligns with the transition to a custom storage solution.apps/mocksi-lite/content/content.tsx (2)
21-21: Import ofStoragemodule is appropriate.The addition of the
Storageimport aligns with the transition to a custom storage solution.
47-47: Transition toStorage.getItemis consistent.The use of
Storage.getIteminstead ofchrome.storage.local.getis consistent with the move towards a more modular storage solution.apps/mocksi-lite/content/utils/Storage.tsx (4)
77-91: LGTM!The
removeItemmethod is well-implemented and handles errors appropriately.
92-106: LGTM!The
clearTabmethod is well-implemented with proper error handling.
107-111: LGTM!The
getStorageForTabmethod is correctly implemented.
121-143: LGTM!The
getTabIdmethod is well-implemented with efficient caching and error handling.apps/mocksi-lite/utils.ts (6)
341-343: LGTM!The
getLastPageDomfunction is correctly implemented using the newStoragemodule.Tools
Biome
[error] 339-343: Illegal use of an export declaration not at the top level
move this declaration to the top level
(parse)
376-379: LGTM!The
getAlterationsfunction is well-implemented, ensuring robustness by returning an empty array if no alterations are found.
Line range hint
384-392:
LGTM!The
getRecordingsStoragefunction is well-implemented, correctly handling data retrieval and parsing.Tools
Biome
[error] 374-380: Illegal use of an export declaration not at the top level
move this declaration to the top level
(parse)
416-421: LGTM!The
updateRecordingsStoragefunction is well-implemented, correctly updating and sorting recordings.Tools
Biome
[error] 394-421: Illegal use of an export declaration not at the top level
move this declaration to the top level
(parse)
423-432: Resolve merge conflict markers.There are unresolved merge conflict markers in the
loadRecordingIdfunction. These need to be addressed to ensure the code compiles and functions correctly.Tools
Biome
[error] 426-426: Expected an expression but instead found '==='.
Expected an expression here.
(parse)
[error] 426-426: Expected an expression but instead found '='.
Expected an expression here.
(parse)
[error] 425-426: Invalid assignment to
result[MOCKSI_RECORDING_ID] ======This expression cannot be assigned to
(parse)
[error] 427-427: Expected an expression, or an assignment but instead found 'return'.
Expected an expression, or an assignment here.
(parse)
[error] 431-432: Expected a statement but instead found '>>>>>>> main'.
Expected a statement here.
(parse)
Line range hint
641-649:
LGTM!The
getTabIdfunction is correctly implemented, ensuring efficient retrieval of the tab ID.apps/mocksi-lite/background.ts (4)
196-218: LGTM!The
handleChatResponsefunction is well-implemented, correctly handling data retrieval, updates, and error logging.
342-358: LGTM!The
getRecordingsfunction is well-implemented, correctly handling data retrieval and updates.
482-482: LGTM!The
setPlayModefunction is correctly implemented, updating the play mode state efficiently.
641-649: LGTM!The
getTabIdfunction is correctly implemented, ensuring efficient retrieval of the tab ID.
|
|
||
| it('should set item for a specific tab id', () => { | ||
| const result = | ||
| }) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Complete the test case implementation.
The test case for setItem is incomplete. You need to add assertions to verify the expected behavior.
- const result =
+ storage.setItem('key', 'value');
+ expect(mockSet).toHaveBeenCalledWith('test-tab-id:key', 'value');Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
Tools
Biome
[error] 31-31: Expected an expression, or an assignment but instead found '}'.
Expected an expression, or an assignment here.
(parse)
| return keys.reduce((acc, curr) => { | ||
| if (data[curr]) { | ||
| return { | ||
| ...acc, | ||
| [curr]: data[curr], | ||
| }; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return acc; | ||
| }, {}); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Optimize accumulator usage in getItem.
Avoid using spread syntax on accumulators in the reduce method, as it leads to O(n^2) time complexity. Consider using Object.assign or a simple loop to improve performance.
- return keys.reduce((acc, curr) => {
- if (data[curr]) {
- return {
- ...acc,
- [curr]: data[curr],
- };
- }
- return acc;
- }, {});
+ const result = {};
+ keys.forEach((key) => {
+ if (data[key]) {
+ result[key] = data[key];
+ }
+ });
+ return result;Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| return keys.reduce((acc, curr) => { | |
| if (data[curr]) { | |
| return { | |
| ...acc, | |
| [curr]: data[curr], | |
| }; | |
| } | |
| return acc; | |
| }, {}); | |
| const result = {}; | |
| keys.forEach((key) => { | |
| if (data[key]) { | |
| result[key] = data[key]; | |
| } | |
| }); | |
| return result; |
Tools
Biome
[error] 45-45: Avoid the use of spread (
...) syntax on accumulators.Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in
.reduce) because it causes a time complexity ofO(n^2).
Consider methods such as .splice or .push instead.(lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread)
apps/mocksi-lite/utils.ts
Outdated
| <<<<<<< HEAD | ||
| console.log('trying', message, body); | ||
| const response = await chrome.runtime.sendMessage({ message, body }) | ||
| console.log('response', message, response.status); | ||
| if (response?.status !== "success") { | ||
| console.log('error time', message, response.status) | ||
| throw new Error( | ||
| `Failed to send message to background script. Received response: ${response}`, | ||
| ); | ||
| } | ||
| ======= | ||
| chrome.runtime.sendMessage(body, message , (response) => | ||
| if (response?.status !== "success") { | ||
| throw new Error( | ||
| `Failed to send message to background script. Received response: ${response}`, | ||
| ); | ||
| } | ||
| >>>>>>> main | ||
|
|
||
| callback(response); | ||
| }); | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| callback(response);catch (error) | ||
| console.log('error time 2', error); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Resolve merge conflict markers.
There are unresolved merge conflict markers in the sendMessage function. These need to be addressed to ensure the code compiles and functions correctly.
<<<<<<< HEAD
console.log('trying', message, body);
const response = await chrome.runtime.sendMessage({ message, body });
console.log('response', message, response.status);
if (response?.status !== "success") {
console.log('error time', message, response.status);
throw new Error(
`Failed to send message to background script. Received response: ${response}`,
);
}
=======
chrome.runtime.sendMessage(body, message, (response) => {
if (response?.status !== "success") {
throw new Error(
`Failed to send message to background script. Received response: ${response}`,
);
}
});
>>>>>>> mainCommittable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| <<<<<<< HEAD | |
| console.log('trying', message, body); | |
| const response = await chrome.runtime.sendMessage({ message, body }) | |
| console.log('response', message, response.status); | |
| if (response?.status !== "success") { | |
| console.log('error time', message, response.status) | |
| throw new Error( | |
| `Failed to send message to background script. Received response: ${response}`, | |
| ); | |
| } | |
| ======= | |
| chrome.runtime.sendMessage(body, message , (response) => | |
| if (response?.status !== "success") { | |
| throw new Error( | |
| `Failed to send message to background script. Received response: ${response}`, | |
| ); | |
| } | |
| >>>>>>> main | |
| callback(response); | |
| }); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| callback(response);catch (error) | |
| console.log('error time 2', error); | |
| console.log('trying', message, body); | |
| const response = await chrome.runtime.sendMessage({ message, body }); | |
| console.log('response', message, response.status); | |
| if (response?.status !== "success") { | |
| console.log('error time', message, response.status); | |
| throw new Error( | |
| `Failed to send message to background script. Received response: ${response}`, | |
| ); | |
| } |
Tools
Biome
[error] 307-309: Expected a statement but instead found '=======
chrome.runtime.sendMessage(body, message , (response) =>'.Expected a statement here.
(parse)
[error] 314-317: Expected a statement but instead found '>>>>>>> main
callback(response)'.Expected a statement here.
(parse)
[error] 317-318: Expected a statement but instead found 'catch (error)
console.log('error time 2', error)'.Expected a statement here.
(parse)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (14)
- apps/mocksi-lite/background.ts (7 hunks)
- apps/mocksi-lite/common/Popup/Draggable.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/mocksi-lite/content/AppStateContext.tsx (4 hunks)
- apps/mocksi-lite/content/ContentApp.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/mocksi-lite/content/EditMode/editMode.ts (2 hunks)
- apps/mocksi-lite/content/ListPopup/DemoItem.tsx (3 hunks)
- apps/mocksi-lite/content/Toast/ChatToast.tsx (3 hunks)
- apps/mocksi-lite/content/Toast/EditToast.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/mocksi-lite/content/content.tsx (6 hunks)
- apps/mocksi-lite/content/utils/Storage.test.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/mocksi-lite/content/utils/Storage.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/mocksi-lite/mckSocket.ts (2 hunks)
- apps/mocksi-lite/networking.ts (2 hunks)
- apps/mocksi-lite/utils.ts (5 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (10)
- apps/mocksi-lite/common/Popup/Draggable.tsx
- apps/mocksi-lite/content/AppStateContext.tsx
- apps/mocksi-lite/content/EditMode/editMode.ts
- apps/mocksi-lite/content/ListPopup/DemoItem.tsx
- apps/mocksi-lite/content/Toast/ChatToast.tsx
- apps/mocksi-lite/content/Toast/EditToast.tsx
- apps/mocksi-lite/content/content.tsx
- apps/mocksi-lite/content/utils/Storage.test.ts
- apps/mocksi-lite/mckSocket.ts
- apps/mocksi-lite/networking.ts
Additional context used
Learnings (2)
apps/mocksi-lite/utils.ts (1)
Learnt from: nicolaschapur PR: Mocksi/HARlighter#80 File: apps/mocksi-lite/content/content.tsx:43-93 Timestamp: 2024-06-28T15:36:05.992Z Learning: The `getRecordingsStorage` function in `utils.ts` returns an empty array when `recordings` is undefined or null, ensuring robustness in downstream function calls.apps/mocksi-lite/background.ts (1)
Learnt from: nicolaschapur PR: Mocksi/HARlighter#80 File: apps/mocksi-lite/content/content.tsx:43-93 Timestamp: 2024-06-28T15:36:05.992Z Learning: The `getRecordingsStorage` function in `utils.ts` returns an empty array when `recordings` is undefined or null, ensuring robustness in downstream function calls.
Additional comments not posted (16)
apps/mocksi-lite/content/ContentApp.tsx (2)
20-20: Import statement is appropriate.The import of
storagefrom./utils/Storageis correctly added to facilitate the transition to the custom storage module.
63-63: Correct implementation ofstorage.setItem.The transition from
chrome.storage.local.settostorage.setItemis correctly implemented, maintaining the function's logic.apps/mocksi-lite/content/utils/Storage.tsx (6)
67-88:setItemmethod implementation is correct.The method correctly handles setting items in storage and error handling.
90-108:removeItemmethod implementation is correct.The method correctly handles removing items from storage and non-existent keys.
110-118:clearStorageForTabmethod implementation is correct.The method correctly handles clearing storage and error handling.
120-128:getStorageForTabmethod implementation is correct.The method correctly retrieves storage for a specific tab and handles non-existent data.
131-139:setStorageForTabmethod implementation is correct.The method correctly handles setting storage and error handling.
141-163:getTabIdmethod implementation is correct.The method correctly handles asynchronous retrieval and caching of the tab ID.
apps/mocksi-lite/utils.ts (5)
331-332:getLastPageDomfunction implementation is correct.The transition to using
storage.getItemis correctly implemented.
366-369:getAlterationsfunction implementation is correct.The transition to using
storage.getItemis correctly implemented.
Line range hint
374-380:
getRecordingsStoragefunction implementation is correct.The transition to using
storage.getItemis correctly implemented and robust.
406-409:updateRecordingsStoragefunction implementation is correct.The transition to using
storage.setItemis correctly implemented and robust.
413-414:loadRecordingIdfunction implementation is correct.The transition to using
storage.getItemis correctly implemented.apps/mocksi-lite/background.ts (3)
196-218: LGTM! But verify the usage ofSTORAGE_KEY.The transition to using
awaitfor asynchronous storage operations enhances readability and error handling.Ensure that
STORAGE_KEYis defined and used correctly throughout the codebase.Verification successful
STORAGE_KEY is correctly defined and used consistently.
The
STORAGE_KEYis defined inapps/mocksi-lite/consts.tsand used appropriately in the codebase, ensuring consistency and reducing the risk of errors.
- Defined in
apps/mocksi-lite/consts.ts:export const STORAGE_KEY = "mocksi-auth";- Used in
background.tsandutils.tsfiles.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the definition and usage of `STORAGE_KEY`. # Test: Search for `STORAGE_KEY` definition and usage. Expect: Proper definition and consistent usage. rg --type typescript 'STORAGE_KEY'Length of output: 69
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the definition and usage of `STORAGE_KEY`. # Test: Search for `STORAGE_KEY` definition and usage. Expect: Proper definition and consistent usage. rg --type ts 'STORAGE_KEY'Length of output: 2554
342-358: LGTM! But verify the usage of therecordingskey in storage.The transition to using
awaitfor asynchronous storage operations enhances readability and error handling.Ensure that the
recordingskey is used consistently in storage operations.Verification successful
Consistent Usage of
recordingsKey in Storage OperationsThe
recordingskey is used consistently across storage operations in the codebase. It is utilized in bothbackground.tsandutils.tsfiles for setting and retrieving recordings. This indicates a coherent approach to handling recordings data within the storage system.
apps/mocksi-lite/utils.ts
- Retrieval and parsing of
recordingsfrom storage.- Setting
recordingsafter processing.apps/mocksi-lite/background.ts
- Multiple instances of setting
recordingsin storage.- Usage in API calls related to recordings.
The usage is consistent and aligns with the intended functionality.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the `recordings` key in storage operations. # Test: Search for the usage of the `recordings` key. Expect: Consistent usage across storage operations. rg --type typescript 'recordings'Length of output: 68
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the `recordings` key in storage operations. # Test: Search for the usage of the `recordings` key in TypeScript files. Expect: Consistent usage across storage operations. rg 'recordings' --glob '*.ts'Length of output: 1997
641-649: Verify the usage of thegetTabIdfunction.The function correctly retrieves and sends the tab ID. Ensure that it is used appropriately in the message handling logic.
Verification successful
The
getTabIdfunction is used appropriately in message handling logic.The function is correctly invoked in the message handling logic and is also covered by test cases, ensuring its behavior is verified. This indicates proper usage and testing within the codebase.
- Code Usage: The function is invoked when
request.message === "getTabId".- Testing: There are test cases that verify the function's behavior.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the `getTabId` function in message handling logic. # Test: Search for `getTabId` usage in message handling. Expect: Proper invocation and handling. rg --type typescript 'getTabId'Length of output: 66
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the `getTabId` function in message handling logic. # Find all TypeScript files and search for `getTabId` usage. fd -e ts -x rg 'getTabId' {}Length of output: 279
| return keys.reduce((acc, curr) => { | ||
| if (data[curr]) { | ||
| return { | ||
| // biome-ignore lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread: this is a small object and spreading is fine | ||
| ...acc, | ||
| [curr]: data[curr], | ||
| }; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return acc; | ||
| }, {}); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Optimize accumulator usage in getItem.
The use of spread syntax on accumulators in the reduce method leads to O(n^2) time complexity. Consider using Object.assign or a simple loop to improve performance.
- return keys.reduce((acc, curr) => {
- if (data[curr]) {
- return {
- ...acc,
- [curr]: data[curr],
- };
- }
- return acc;
- }, {});
+ const result = {};
+ keys.forEach((key) => {
+ if (data[key]) {
+ result[key] = data[key];
+ }
+ });
+ return result;Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| return keys.reduce((acc, curr) => { | |
| if (data[curr]) { | |
| return { | |
| // biome-ignore lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread: this is a small object and spreading is fine | |
| ...acc, | |
| [curr]: data[curr], | |
| }; | |
| } | |
| return acc; | |
| }, {}); | |
| const result = {}; | |
| keys.forEach((key) => { | |
| if (data[key]) { | |
| result[key] = data[key]; | |
| } | |
| }); | |
| return result; |
Summary by CodeRabbit
Storagemodule for managing local storage, enhancing modularity and maintainability.Storagemodule for storing and retrieving data, streamlining code and improving readability.Storagemodule to ensure reliable storage management.Storagemodule.