Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Apply groupby patch based on rapidsai/cudf#17985 to branch-24.12 #2920

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: branch-24.12
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

pmattione-nvidia
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR applies a patch to 24.12 that contains the core fix to the groupby algorithm that was merged into cuDF 25.02.

Signed-off-by: Paul Mattione <[email protected]>
@pmattione-nvidia pmattione-nvidia marked this pull request as ready for review February 13, 2025 20:01
@pmattione-nvidia pmattione-nvidia requested a review from a team as a code owner February 13, 2025 20:01
gerashegalov
gerashegalov previously approved these changes Feb 13, 2025
@ttnghia ttnghia changed the base branch from branch-25.04 to branch-24.12 February 13, 2025 23:04
@ttnghia ttnghia dismissed gerashegalov’s stale review February 13, 2025 23:04

The base branch was changed.

@ttnghia
Copy link
Collaborator

ttnghia commented Feb 13, 2025

Since we are applying to 24.12, I'm not sure how to merge this. Maybe it needs ops team to work on it.

@pmattione-nvidia
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Since we are applying to 24.12, I'm not sure how to merge this. Maybe it needs ops team to work on it.

The plan at the moment is to not merge it. Perhaps that will change, but we won't do that for now.

@sameerz
Copy link
Collaborator

sameerz commented Feb 15, 2025

We are going to try for a 24.12.2 patch release with this PR. Please comment as needed, or approve if it looks ok. .
@ttnghia
@gerashegalov

@sameerz
Copy link
Collaborator

sameerz commented Feb 15, 2025

build

@gerashegalov gerashegalov changed the title Apply groupby patch Apply groupby patch based on rapidsai/cudf#17985 to branch-24.12 Feb 15, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

@gerashegalov gerashegalov Feb 15, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I missed in the first review that this file should have a name starting with 1_ in order to make sure that this patch is applied after the 0_ patch.

However, the patches have no conflict. The order is still established given 'f' > '0'. But we need to be careful if more patches are required.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants