Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

grpc: 1.62.1 -> 1.67.0 #350432

Open
wants to merge 8 commits into
base: staging
Choose a base branch
from
Open

grpc: 1.62.1 -> 1.67.0 #350432

wants to merge 8 commits into from

Conversation

scraptux
Copy link
Contributor

@scraptux scraptux commented Oct 22, 2024

Updates grpc and all corresponding python packages to 1.67.0.
Changelog: https://github.com/grpc/grpc/releases/tag/v1.67.0

Fixes current incompatibility between packages due to differing versions. #349050

Things done

  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
    • sandbox = relaxed
    • sandbox = true
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 24.11 Release Notes (or backporting 23.11 and 24.05 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

@scraptux scraptux marked this pull request as ready for review October 22, 2024 10:06
@matdibu
Copy link
Contributor

matdibu commented Oct 22, 2024

could/should this include the additional changes to python312Packages.grpcio proposed in #349727 ?

@scraptux
Copy link
Contributor Author

could/should this include the additional changes to python312Packages.grpcio proposed in #349727 ?

I was not aware of additional changes other than updating the version.
I force-pushed the other changes.

Thanks for noticing!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants