Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feluda: init at 1.3.0 #382154

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

feluda: init at 1.3.0 #382154

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

transgirllucy
Copy link

Things done

  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
    • sandbox = relaxed
    • sandbox = true
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 25.05 Release Notes (or backporting 24.11 and 25.05 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the 8.has: maintainer-list (update) This PR changes `maintainers/maintainer-list.nix` label Feb 14, 2025
@ofborg ofborg bot added the 2.status: merge conflict This PR has merge conflicts with the target branch label Feb 14, 2025
@ofborg ofborg bot removed the 2.status: merge conflict This PR has merge conflicts with the target branch label Feb 14, 2025
Copy link
Member

@ethancedwards8 ethancedwards8 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Few minor things.

src = fetchFromGitHub {
owner = "anistark";
repo = pname;
rev = "98fd4a640cec620dee85c595ec1376949bb025e5";
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

please use the version tag. https://github.com/anistark/feluda/releases/tag/1.3.0. the version should be 1.3.0 as well. Also, please do not use pname recursively. Also, please use hash with the hash prefix instead of sha256. Example:

Suggested change
rev = "98fd4a640cec620dee85c595ec1376949bb025e5";
repo = "feluda";
tag = version;
hash = "sha256-...";

pkgs/by-name/fe/feluda/package.nix Show resolved Hide resolved
pkgs/by-name/fe/feluda/package.nix Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@transgirllucy transgirllucy changed the title feluda: init at 2.7.7 feluda: init at 1.3.0 Feb 14, 2025
pkgs/by-name/fe/feluda/package.nix Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkgs/by-name/fe/feluda/package.nix Show resolved Hide resolved
@ethancedwards8
Copy link
Member

@transgirllucy why did you mark this thread as resolved? #382154 (comment) . Using your own lock files is discouraged as they are hard to review and consume significant disk space/increase eval times. Please consider using the upstream repo's lock file or add a comment noting why the upstream one will not work if that is the case.

@ethancedwards8
Copy link
Member

Also, please make it a practice of building your packages locally before pushing them.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants