forked from Dao-AILab/flash-attention
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 49
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fp8 backward #119
Draft
micmelesse
wants to merge
19
commits into
main_perf
Choose a base branch
from
micmelesse/fp8_bwd
base: main_perf
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+719
−398
Draft
fp8 backward #119
Changes from 14 commits
Commits
Show all changes
19 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
156a9bc
Enable BWD fp8 with split kernel
micmelesse e6a67b3
add type info for backward
micmelesse c13c0f0
fix DEBUG flag bug
micmelesse acb05ad
fix bug with backward. Normal forward works with dropout. Segfault wi…
micmelesse ca267ed
pass descale strides
micmelesse 00d1c6f
test causal
micmelesse 3ba93db
fix causal compiler assert. min head should be 32
micmelesse 3694224
remove descale_p
micmelesse 7908150
save
micmelesse 86fd7e6
explict name as causal
micmelesse 01b370a
isolate bad case
micmelesse 290d594
just run fp8 tests
micmelesse e9e4d6e
bench with autotune
micmelesse 736a990
min changes
micmelesse 9fc0d0a
cast_fp8 helper
micmelesse db15c3d
cast_varlen_to_fp8
micmelesse 32d552e
save
micmelesse fbb00d6
minor
micmelesse 9615417
highlight failing configs
micmelesse File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Question: My knowledge of GitHub actions is almost none, so please take this comment with a grain of salt... As far as I can see, MI300 integration job is commented out. Am I correct? Do we really want to merge this way?