Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
[improve](blog): front matter(add excerpt) (#694)
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
Signed-off-by: Ralph Hightower <[email protected]>
  • Loading branch information
RalphHightower authored Jan 14, 2025
1 parent 4de23cd commit eb75abd
Showing 1 changed file with 2 additions and 2 deletions.
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions _posts/2025/01/2025-01-14-DOJ-SC-Report-TrumpGuilty.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ layout: post
tags: [2020 presidential election, election interference, election fraud, January 6 2021 Insurrection, Department of Justice (DOJ), special counsel, Jack Smith, Federal Attorney General, Merrick Garland, politics]
categories: [Donald Trump]
date: 2025-01-14 5:52 PM
excerpt: ''
excerpt: "The Department’s view that the Constitution prohibits the continued indictment and prosecution of a President is categorical and does not tum on the gravity of the crimes charged, the strength of the Government’s proof, or the merits of the prosecution, which the Office stands fully behind. Indeed, but for Mr. Trump’s election and imminent return to the Presidency, the Office assessed that the admissible evidence was sufficient to obtain and sustain a conviction at trial. – Special Counsel Jack Smith's Report to US Attorney General Merrick Garland"
#image: 'BASEURL/assets/blog/img/.png'
#description:
#permalink:
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -110,4 +110,4 @@ On remand from the [Supreme Court's](https://www.supremecourt.gov/) decision in

The [Department's](https://www.justice.gov/) view that the [Constitution](https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/) prohibits the continued indictment and prosecution of a [President](https://www.whitehouse.gov/) is categorical and does not tum on the gravity of the crimes charged, the strength of the [Government's](https://www.usa.gov/) proof, or the merits of the prosecution, which the [Office](https://www.justice.gov/sco-smith) stands fully behind. Indeed, but for Mr. Trump's election and imminent return to the [Presidency](https://www.whitehouse.gov/), the [Office](https://www.justice.gov/sco-smith) assessed that the admissible evidence was sufficient to obtain and sustain a conviction at trial.

@RalphHightower: Trump would have been sentenced to prison.
@RalphHightower: Trump would have been sentenced to prison.

0 comments on commit eb75abd

Please sign in to comment.