Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

split_behaviors - function #51

Merged
merged 60 commits into from
Dec 6, 2024
Merged

split_behaviors - function #51

merged 60 commits into from
Dec 6, 2024

Conversation

aoliveram
Copy link
Collaborator

The main idea is to construct a function that splits each behavior inside a multi-diff rdiffnet object in order to be able to run plots and other functions already constructed for one behavior only without the necessity of having to rewrite all those functions.

aoliveram and others added 30 commits October 29, 2024 17:05
…ication following the merge of the 41... branch
…net_make_threshold. Some modification in rdiffnet too. Not expecting to work yet.
… from -list-. For example: rdiffnet(100,10, seed.p.adopt = list(.1, .05)), or adding seed.nodes=c(1,2,3,4), seed.nodes=random, or seed.nodes=c(random,central). Respective tests added.
… work to be done to display a line saying 'number of behaviors', and to fix the summary() function.
… work to be done to display a line saying 'number of behaviors', and to fix the summary() function.
… 2. modifications to toa_diff, now allowing for matrix and multiple-diff diffnet obj, 3. tests for toa_diff with multi-diff inputs, 4. adding split_behavior as new function in rdiffnet, and 5. adding tests for split_behaviors in test-rdiffnet
@gvegayon gvegayon changed the base branch from refactor-rdiffnet to master November 22, 2024 18:12
@gvegayon gvegayon merged commit 1efc0be into master Dec 6, 2024
4 checks passed
@gvegayon gvegayon deleted the 47-split-behaviors-rdiffnet branch December 6, 2024 05:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants