Added support and integration with 'ammonext' physics.

[alkavan]

It seems ammo physics is not so easy to integrate correctly, what do you think about physics branch?

• Added example Sphere component PhysicsSphere
• Added example Plane component PhysicsPlane

[sasha240100]

Thanks for suggestion! See my comments

[sasha240100]

Is there a need for PhysicsPlane, PhysicsSphere ... ?
I mean that they are used only once in code.

[sasha240100]

BasicComponent was created to show how to organize a first simple component (similarly to React).

[sasha240100]

That will overwrite all modules array. I'd recommend using this.applyModule() after calling super(...).

this.applyModule(
  new PlaneModule({
    mass: 0
  })
);

[sasha240100]

But, anyway, that's just my suggestion of how to do it properly. For very specific component you can ignore that. But if you want to make your components universal - use the code above.

[sasha240100]

It seems we don't use wasm in this example. If you want to use wasm build - read this and get those files.
You need ammoloader.js and ammo.wasm files.

new WorldModule({
   wasmBuffer: 'ammo.wasm',
   ammo: 'ammoloader.js'
})

See this code.

[alkavan]

I've made a commit being more explicit about everything, better for example.
However I did not realize the Ammo.js integration (with THREE) is still in this state.

I saw your repository at https://github.com/sasha240100/ammojs-build-files
I see now how I missed some parts. My whole point was to use the WebAssembly example.
Will do another commit with proper wasm integration using your builds on that repo.

[sasha240100]

@alkavan There is no need for wasm (no extra optimization on loading time yet)

[alkavan]

@sasha240100 I've updated the PR. Removed wasm dependency, and Improved the demo.
I'm gonna try loading the wasm on my project first, I see it's still too experimental perhaps.