Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[INLONG-11711][SDK] SortSDK shares the same PulsarClient among different SortTasks to avoid performance bottlenecks caused by too many PulsarClients #11712

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

luchunliang
Copy link
Contributor

[INLONG-11711][SDK] SortSDK shares the same PulsarClient among different SortTasks to avoid performance bottlenecks caused by too many PulsarClients

Fixes #11711

Motivation

SortSDK shares the same PulsarClient among different SortTasks to avoid performance bottlenecks caused by too many PulsarClients

Modifications

Excessive PulsarClients lead to significant CPU consumption in waitForNextTick.
image

Verifying this change

(Please pick either of the following options)

  • This change is a trivial rework/code cleanup without any test coverage.

  • This change is already covered by existing tests, such as:
    (please describe tests)

  • This change added tests and can be verified as follows:

    (example:)

    • Added integration tests for end-to-end deployment with large payloads (10MB)
    • Extended integration test for recovery after broker failure

Documentation

  • Does this pull request introduce a new feature? (yes / no)
  • If yes, how is the feature documented? (not applicable / docs / JavaDocs / not documented)
  • If a feature is not applicable for documentation, explain why?
  • If a feature is not documented yet in this PR, please create a follow-up issue for adding the documentation

…ent SortTasks to avoid performance bottlenecks caused by too many PulsarClients
@luchunliang luchunliang added this to the 2.2.0 milestone Jan 26, 2025
@luchunliang luchunliang self-assigned this Jan 26, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
1 participant