-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 442
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Subclass SchemaGenerator instead of defining a new one #470
Open
kevin-brown
wants to merge
20
commits into
axnsan12:master
Choose a base branch
from
kevin-brown:GH-461-schemagenerator-subclass
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Subclass SchemaGenerator instead of defining a new one #470
kevin-brown
wants to merge
20
commits into
axnsan12:master
from
kevin-brown:GH-461-schemagenerator-subclass
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
While the SchemaGenerator provided by DRF-YASG is not API-compatible with the one used by DRF, it does use a lot of the methods and even generates a DRF one internally. Given that this required quite a bit of extra code to be written to do the wrapping, it makes sense to instead just subclass it and get those additional benefits. This should make it eaiser to migrate from the CoreAPISchemaGenerator, which is what is currently being used, to the DRF-provided OpenAPISchemaGenerator for the internal serialization. That was not done here because there is still a lot of work that needs to be done in order to enable that.
PaulWay
approved these changes
Nov 28, 2019
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this is a good idea.
1e013f0
to
1920a81
Compare
fix map source mapping
[readme] Fix missing re_path import
Add utf-8 support for generated formats
Remove universal wheel, python 2 is unsupported
Fix old spelling errors and add a cspell configuration.
…-arbitrary-references Allow specifying response as a reference
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
While the SchemaGenerator provided by DRF-YASG is not API-compatible with the one used by DRF, it does use a lot of the methods and even generates a DRF one internally. Given that this required quite a bit of extra code to be written to do the wrapping, it makes sense to instead just subclass it and get those additional benefits.
This should make it easier to migrate from the CoreAPISchemaGenerator, which is what is currently being used, to the DRF-provided OpenAPISchemaGenerator for the internal serialization. That was not done here because there is still a lot of work that needs to be done in order to enable that.