Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: sync chrome-for-testing json files #737

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 30, 2024

Conversation

fengmk2
Copy link
Member

@fengmk2 fengmk2 commented Nov 30, 2024

closes #730

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced data fetching for Chrome for Testing with new JSON entries for version management.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved data validation in tests to ensure correct structure and content of fetched data.
  • Tests

    • Added assertions to validate properties of fetched items in the ChromeForTestingBinary tests.

@fengmk2 fengmk2 added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 30, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 30, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve modifications to the ChromeForTestingBinary class, specifically the addition of three new JSON files to the dirItems object within the #syncDirItems method. These files are related to Chrome for Testing and include properties such as name, date, size, isDir, and url. Additionally, the test file for this class has been updated to include assertions that validate the properties of the fetched data, enhancing the robustness of the tests.

Changes

File Change Summary
app/common/adapter/binary/ChromeForTestingBinary.ts Added three JSON file entries to dirItems in #syncDirItems method, including properties like name, date, size, isDir, and url.
test/common/adapter/binary/ChromeForTestingBinary.test.ts Enhanced fetch() test case with assertions for the properties of the first three items in the result set.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Increase synchronization of two JSON files in Chrome for Testing (730)

Possibly related PRs

  • fix: adapter new html format on nodejs.org/dist #728: The changes in the NodeBinary class's fetch method involve modifications to how data is extracted and structured, which is conceptually similar to the updates made in the ChromeForTestingBinary class's #syncDirItems method regarding data handling and object construction.

Poem

🐇 In the land of code, we hop and play,
New JSON files brighten the day!
With tests so strong, they stand the test,
Fetching data, we do our best!
So here’s to changes, both swift and bright,
A leap for Chrome, oh what a sight! 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 30, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.39%. Comparing base (f240799) to head (c58a82f).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #737   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.39%   96.39%           
=======================================
  Files         191      191           
  Lines       18995    19017   +22     
  Branches     2498     2498           
=======================================
+ Hits        18310    18332   +22     
  Misses        685      685           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
test/common/adapter/binary/ChromeForTestingBinary.test.ts (1)

20-28: LGTM! Consider extracting test constants.

The test assertions comprehensively validate the new JSON files' properties. However, consider extracting the timestamp and file names into constants to improve test maintainability.

+ const TEST_TIMESTAMP = '2023-09-16T00:21:21.964Z';
+ const JSON_FILES = {
+   KNOWN_GOOD_VERSIONS: 'known-good-versions-with-downloads.json',
+   LATEST_PATCH_VERSIONS: 'latest-patch-versions-per-build.json',
+   LAST_KNOWN_GOOD: 'last-known-good-versions.json',
+ };

  assert.equal(result?.items[0].name, JSON_FILES.KNOWN_GOOD_VERSIONS);
  assert.equal(result?.items[0].date, TEST_TIMESTAMP);
app/common/adapter/binary/ChromeForTestingBinary.ts (3)

49-69: Consider centralizing URLs and improving size handling.

The implementation successfully adds the required JSON files, but there are a few potential improvements:

  1. The URLs could be centralized as constants to avoid duplication and make updates easier
  2. The size property is hardcoded to '-', consider fetching actual file sizes or removing if not needed
+ private static readonly BASE_URL = 'https://googlechromelabs.github.io/chrome-for-testing';
+ private static readonly JSON_FILES = {
+   KNOWN_GOOD_VERSIONS: 'known-good-versions-with-downloads.json',
+   LATEST_PATCH_VERSIONS: 'latest-patch-versions-per-build.json',
+   LAST_KNOWN_GOOD: 'last-known-good-versions.json',
+ };

- const jsonApiEndpoint = 'https://googlechromelabs.github.io/chrome-for-testing/known-good-versions-with-downloads.json';
+ const jsonApiEndpoint = `${ChromeForTestingBinary.BASE_URL}/${ChromeForTestingBinary.JSON_FILES.KNOWN_GOOD_VERSIONS}`;

Line range hint 29-41: Consider adding retry mechanism for HTTP requests.

The HTTP request to fetch JSON data lacks a retry mechanism. Given that this is a critical synchronization operation, consider implementing retries with exponential backoff.

+ private async requestWithRetry(url: string, maxRetries = 3, initialDelay = 1000) {
+   let lastError;
+   for (let i = 0; i < maxRetries; i++) {
+     try {
+       const response = await this.httpclient.request(url, {
+         dataType: 'json',
+         timeout: 30000,
+         followRedirect: true,
+         gzip: true,
+       });
+       return response;
+     } catch (error) {
+       lastError = error;
+       await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, initialDelay * Math.pow(2, i)));
+     }
+   }
+   throw lastError;
+ }

Line range hint 42-48: Consider caching the fetched data.

Since the data is timestamped and only needs to be updated when changed, consider implementing a caching mechanism to reduce unnecessary HTTP requests.

This could be implemented using:

  1. In-memory cache with TTL
  2. File-system cache with timestamp validation
  3. Distributed cache if running in a cluster
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1d128e2 and c58a82f.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • app/common/adapter/binary/ChromeForTestingBinary.ts (1 hunks)
  • test/common/adapter/binary/ChromeForTestingBinary.test.ts (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
app/common/adapter/binary/ChromeForTestingBinary.ts (1)

Line range hint 29-41: Verify HTTPS certificate validation.

While the implementation uses HTTPS URLs, ensure that certificate validation is properly enforced in the HTTP client configuration.

✅ Verification successful

Based on the analysis of the configuration files and HTTP client usage, I can now provide a final response:

HTTPS certificate validation is properly enforced by default

The HTTP client configuration in config.default.ts shows that the application uses secure defaults:

  • Uses HTTPS URLs for external services
  • No certificate validation disabling settings found
  • HTTP client is configured with secure defaults: useHttpClientNext: true, allowH2: true
  • No rejectUnauthorized: false or strictSSL: false settings found in the codebase

The implementation is secure as it maintains proper certificate validation.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify HTTPS certificate validation settings in the codebase

# Check for certificate validation settings
rg -l "rejectUnauthorized.*false" .
rg -l "strictSSL.*false" .

Length of output: 66


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the HTTP client implementation and configuration
# First, find the HTTP client implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ implements HttpClient'

# Also check for any HTTP-related configuration
rg -l "httpclient.*config" .

# Check the actual HTTP client usage and configuration
rg "new.*HttpClient" -A 5

Length of output: 197


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of the files that have HTTP client config
cat ./app/core/service/BinarySyncerService.ts ./app/core/service/PackageSyncerService.ts

# Also check for any HTTP-related imports to find the client implementation
rg "import.*Http" -A 1

# Check for any security-related configuration in the application
rg -i "ssl|tls|certificate|secure" .

Length of output: 132435


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the HTTP client configuration in the application
# First, check for any HTTP client configuration files
rg -l "httpclient.*config" config/

# Then check the HTTP client initialization and configuration
ast-grep --pattern 'new EggHttpClient($$$)'

# Also check for any HTTPS/SSL configuration in config files
rg -l "https|ssl|secure" config/

Length of output: 369


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the default configuration for HTTP client and HTTPS settings
cat config/config.default.ts

# Also check the binaries configuration for any HTTPS settings
cat config/binaries.ts

# Check for any HTTP client options in the codebase
rg "httpclient.*options" -A 3

Length of output: 40333

@fengmk2 fengmk2 merged commit 9bb12fd into master Nov 30, 2024
18 checks passed
@fengmk2 fengmk2 deleted the known-good-versions-with-downloads.json branch November 30, 2024 14:29
fengmk2 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 30, 2024
[skip ci]

## [3.71.0](v3.70.0...v3.71.0) (2024-11-30)

### Features

* sync chrome-for-testing json files ([#737](#737)) ([9bb12fd](9bb12fd))
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

请问是否可以增加2个chrome-for-testing中的json文件的同步
1 participant