manifest add: check for local images last #1919
Conversation
| if err == nil { | ||
| src.Close() | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| if err != nil { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
did you mean for this conditional to handle the alltransports.parseimagename from earlier ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes, I expect alltransports.ParseImageName() to fail when given a string that consists of "docker://" followed by exactly 64 hex digits.
| @@ -325,8 +325,19 @@ func (m *ManifestList) Add(ctx context.Context, name string, options *ManifestLi | |||
| if err != nil { | |||
| withDocker := fmt.Sprintf("%s://%s", docker.Transport.Name(), name) | |||
| ref, err = alltransports.ParseImageName(withDocker) | |||
| if err == nil { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
looks like this whole block up until the LookupImage part is the same in all the places where you touched this so I think it would make sense to move this into a helper function to avoid the duplication
When adding a reference to a manifest list or image index, if we are guessing that it's a reference to an image in a registry, check if we can read something from that location instead of assuming it's correct, and if we can't, check for a local image. This will let use use local image IDs to refer to items that we want to add to a list or index. Signed-off-by: Nalin Dahyabhai <[email protected]>
nalind
force-pushed
the
index-resolve-images
branch
from
4f6a77c to
809a23e
Compare
Signed-off-by: Nalin Dahyabhai <[email protected]>
|
@vrothberg PTAL |
|
No time to review, please don't block on me. |
|
/approve |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: nalind, rhatdan The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
When adding a reference to a manifest list or image index, if we are guessing that it's a reference to an image in a registry, check if we can read something from that location instead of assuming it's correct, and if we can't, check for a local image. This will let use use local image IDs to refer to items that we want to add to a list or index.
This would at least provide more of a workaround for #1896, in that specifying the desired image using only its ID would start working.