Use CODEOWNERS file for autoassign

[dougsland]

Let's make users and developers be aware of PRs/issues etc.

Resolves: #668

Summary by Sourcery

Use CODEOWNERS for auto-assignment of issues and pull requests.

CI:

• Introduce the CODEOWNERS file.

Chores:

• Remove the OWNERS file.

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request introduces a CODEOWNERS file and removes the OWNERS file. This change will enable automatic assignment of pull requests and issues to the appropriate team or individual based on the file paths modified.

No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation.

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Introduce CODEOWNERS file and remove OWNERS file.	Added .github/CODEOWNERS file. Removed OWNERS file.	.github/CODEOWNERS OWNERS

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
  review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
  @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
  want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
  (re-)generate the summary at any time.
• Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
  request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
• Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
  pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
  addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
• Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
  request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
  want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
  @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!
• Generate a plan of action for an issue: Comment @sourcery-ai plan on
  an issue to generate a plan of action for it.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[sourcery-ai]

Hey @dougsland - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

Overall Comments:

• The PR shows the deletion of OWNERS but doesn't include the content of the new CODEOWNERS file. Please include the ownership mappings in the new file.
• Consider documenting how the ownership information was migrated from the old OWNERS file to ensure no configurations were lost in the transition.

Here's what I looked at during the review

• 🟢 General issues: all looks good
• 🟢 Security: all looks good
• 🟢 Testing: all looks good
• 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
• 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.}

[ericcurtin]

Are we ok to remove this @rhatdan ? I don't know all the differences between these owners files.

[rhatdan]

LGTM