-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 53
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix issue with removeLinkStorages when specificaly querying the link field #388
Open
vparpoil
wants to merge
7
commits into
cult-of-coders:master
Choose a base branch
from
vparpoil:fix-386
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
658bf1d
fix issue with removeLinkStorages when specificaly querying the link …
vparpoil 9fc2407
Revert "fix issue with removeLinkStorages when specificaly querying t…
vparpoil d92b7d8
Adding test case to highlight issue #386
vparpoil 84b06c3
Sort body fields to first add all fields to the CollectioNode
vparpoil 1b88531
Merge branch 'master' into fix-386
StorytellerCZ cef24d0
Merge branch 'master' into fix-386
StorytellerCZ 203c378
Merge branch 'master' into fix-386
StorytellerCZ File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not sure if sorting is the right idea here. It may fail for nested links. I think the solution is to not mark the field as scheduled for deletion, or use it above the link.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, with that sorting function we are doing kind of a guesswork. Why not make this process 2-pass? First, we determine what are props, fields, reducers and links. Second, we add them. Props and fields first, then links and reducers.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for your time reviewing
Since the fields are not yet added in
_shouldCleanStorage
, thehasField
method cannot see that the field is supposed to be there.We could update this line and change it with
Would that be a better solution @theodorDiaconu ?