The return_route extension is utilized by coordinate-mediation and messagepickup #92
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
FabioPinheiro
changed the title
FabioPinheiro
force-pushed
the
return_route_should_be_used
branch
from
60cba0c to
337372c
Compare
TelegramSam
reviewed
Aug 21, 2023
|
Added a suggestion, which adds a link, some clarification about frequency of the |
FabioPinheiro
commented
Aug 25, 2023
| "limit": 30, | ||
| "offset": 0 | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
missing "return_route": "all" ?
FabioPinheiro
force-pushed
the
return_route_should_be_used
branch
from
afbf834 to
83c5a44
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We are just clarifying some things in the protocol about the return_route as discussing the last DIF DID Comm meeting.
https://us02web.zoom.us/rec/share/iwQV16LJ9pDC_xInCSKfIIeSpagNEJDjJC4b55d8P3o4MWZDTthFA8ehMTovnThy.qUtcyz8pPHOlo9YG
Initial discussion in #87