Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use Hazelcast 5.5.0 #170

Closed
wants to merge 37 commits into from
Closed

Use Hazelcast 5.5.0 #170

wants to merge 37 commits into from

Conversation

TomaszGaweda
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

ldziedziul
ldziedziul previously approved these changes Dec 9, 2024
JamesHazelcast
JamesHazelcast previously approved these changes Dec 18, 2024
@@ -382,6 +382,18 @@
<artifactId>httpclient</artifactId>
<version>${httpclient.version}</version>
<scope>test</scope>
<exclusions>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why exclusions? Maybe left a comment?

assertEquals("value", executeRequest("read", serverPort2, cookieStore));
}

@Test(timeout = 20000)
@Test
@RetryingTest(5)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why RetryingTest here?

@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
</init-param>
<init-param>
<param-name>sticky-session</param-name>
<param-value>false</param-value>
<param-value>true</param-value>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why this change?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why do we need it?

@TomaszGaweda
Copy link
Contributor Author

verify

1 similar comment
@TomaszGaweda
Copy link
Contributor Author

verify

@TomaszGaweda
Copy link
Contributor Author

Just for the record (we spoke with Łukasz on Slack): those latest commits were just test changes, I was trying to localize the reason for some test failures.

I will re-request review once I get the test to be stable.

@TomaszGaweda
Copy link
Contributor Author

verify

@TomaszGaweda TomaszGaweda dismissed stale reviews from ldziedziul and JamesHazelcast January 15, 2025 18:07

Was for old version

@TomaszGaweda TomaszGaweda removed the request for review from JamesHazelcast January 15, 2025 18:07
@TomaszGaweda TomaszGaweda changed the title Use newest Hazelcast Use Hazelcast 5.5.0 Jan 15, 2025
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 14, 2025

Test Results

 15 files   15 suites   24m 51s ⏱️
186 tests 186 ✅ 0 💤 0 ❌
331 runs  331 ✅ 0 💤 0 ❌

Results for commit 77ff7c1.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

<option name="MAIN_CLASS_NAME" value="" />
<option name="METHOD_NAME" value="" />
<option name="TEST_OBJECT" value="class" />
<option name="VM_PARAMETERS" value="-ea -Djava.net.preferIPv4Stack=true" />
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added because we want to use java.net.preferIPv4Stack always

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants