-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 33
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use Hazelcast 5.5.0 #170
Use Hazelcast 5.5.0 #170
Conversation
…r confs, cleanups
…the issue that session MAY indeed not be propagated
@@ -382,6 +382,18 @@ | |||
<artifactId>httpclient</artifactId> | |||
<version>${httpclient.version}</version> | |||
<scope>test</scope> | |||
<exclusions> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why exclusions? Maybe left a comment?
src/test/java/com/hazelcast/wm/test/jetty/WebFilterBasicTest.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
assertEquals("value", executeRequest("read", serverPort2, cookieStore)); | ||
} | ||
|
||
@Test(timeout = 20000) | ||
@Test | ||
@RetryingTest(5) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why RetryingTest
here?
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ | |||
</init-param> | |||
<init-param> | |||
<param-name>sticky-session</param-name> | |||
<param-value>false</param-value> | |||
<param-value>true</param-value> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why this change?
.officialRun/Template JUnit.run.xml
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why do we need it?
…itigate the issue that session MAY indeed not be propagated" This reverts commit 60d843f.
verify |
1 similar comment
verify |
Just for the record (we spoke with Łukasz on Slack): those latest commits were just test changes, I was trying to localize the reason for some test failures. I will re-request review once I get the test to be stable. |
Co-authored-by: Łukasz Dziedziul <[email protected]>
verify |
Was for old version
49ba7eb
to
883e236
Compare
# Conflicts: # pom.xml
…zGaweda-patch-1 # Conflicts: # pom.xml
Test Results 15 files 15 suites 24m 51s ⏱️ Results for commit 77ff7c1. ♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results. |
ac93215
to
cd3c19b
Compare
796687a
to
77ff7c1
Compare
<option name="MAIN_CLASS_NAME" value="" /> | ||
<option name="METHOD_NAME" value="" /> | ||
<option name="TEST_OBJECT" value="class" /> | ||
<option name="VM_PARAMETERS" value="-ea -Djava.net.preferIPv4Stack=true" /> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Added because we want to use java.net.preferIPv4Stack
always
No description provided.