-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix model kwargs #35875
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Fix model kwargs #35875
Conversation
The docs for this PR live here. All of your documentation changes will be reflected on that endpoint. The docs are available until 30 days after the last update. |
test_modeling_names.txt
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
to remove
loss = self.loss_function( | ||
shift_logits.view(batch_size * seq_length, vocab_size), | ||
shift_labels.view(batch_size * seq_length), | ||
vocab_size=vocab_size, | ||
**kwargs, | ||
) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
bit weird, the refactor here should make you only have to pass inputs and the shifts will happen inside
What does this PR do?
Adds unused
**kwargs
to particular models so thatnum_items_in_batch
can work as intendedFixes #35838
Before submitting
Pull Request section?
to it if that's the case.
documentation guidelines, and
here are tips on formatting docstrings.
Who can review?
Anyone in the community is free to review the PR once the tests have passed. Feel free to tag
members/contributors who may be interested in your PR.
@ArthurZucker