Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Border Router STUN Server Implementation #1

Draft
wants to merge 40 commits into
base: upstream-master
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Conversation

jdslab
Copy link
Owner

@jdslab jdslab commented Feb 18, 2025

Modification to border router dataplane to process STUN requests, as described in the design document and discussion.

@jdslab jdslab requested a review from marcfrei February 18, 2025 20:12
@jdslab jdslab requested review from tzaeschke and marcfrei February 23, 2025 02:46
Copy link
Collaborator

@marcfrei marcfrei left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  • Very nice that all customizations of the test topology are encapsulated in demo/stun/test.py now!
  • Unfortuantely, there have been quite some changes in upstream scionproto. Could you please try and rebase this branch and also your other branch upstream-master on scionproto again?

Copy link
Collaborator

@marcfrei marcfrei left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Cleanup pass; update to current version of the original scion-testnet programs

@@ -0,0 +1,129 @@
#!/usr/bin/env python3

# Copyright 2024 ETH Zurich
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It would be good to also have a README.md for this demo. Possibly with some ASCII art like, e.g., in demo/file_transfer/README.md.

file.write(filecontent)

def _run(self):
time.sleep(20) # wait for everything to start up
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This seems a bit excessive...?
Have you tried that on CI?

Copy link
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I reduced the waiting time to 10s now. This is also the waiting time in the DRKey Acceptance Test.

@marcfrei
Copy link
Collaborator

There's quite some activity on scionproto at the moment. Could you please rebase this branch on the most recent version again so that we can see the real diff again?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants