Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding GEP-3567: Gateway TLS Updates for HTTP/2 Connection Coalescing #3572

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

robscott
Copy link
Member

What type of PR is this?
/kind gep

What this PR does / why we need it:
This is a relatively small GEP that may not need to be a GEP, but creating one for the purpose of record keeping. Hoping to get at least A and B in v1.3. This is tracked by #3567.

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

NONE

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. kind/gep PRs related to Gateway Enhancement Proposal(GEP) cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. labels Jan 28, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested a review from candita January 28, 2025 07:13
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: robscott

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jan 28, 2025

### C) Top Level Gateway TLS Config for Client Cert Validation

GEP-91 will be updated to move this configuration to a new top level Gateway TLS
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How is this expected to interact with gateway merging/ListenerSets?

@mlavacca
Copy link
Member

/cc

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested a review from mlavacca January 28, 2025 16:59

GEP-91 will be updated to move this configuration to a new top level Gateway TLS
config instead of per-listener.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

do you mean move or copy the client cert validation field ? imo there's still value in per listener client validation for non intersecting hostnames

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd argue that it should be "move", but the only thing I'm trying to communicate here is that we'll need follow up changes in GEP-91. Will update the wording to be more open-ended here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. kind/gep PRs related to Gateway Enhancement Proposal(GEP) release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants