Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add lazyjournal #843

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

add lazyjournal #843

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

Lifailon
Copy link

@Lifailon Lifailon commented Dec 3, 2024

This is a universal project for quick access to Linux logs.

Full list of features:

  • Simple installation, to run it, just download a single executable file without dependencies.
  • View all system and user units logs via journalctl (tool for reading logs using journald from systemd).
  • List of all system boots for kernel log output.
  • File system logs from /var/log (for example, for Apache or Nginx), as well as syslog, dmesg (kernel) and user authentication (wtmp and btmp) sorted by modification date.
  • View all log files in the home directories of users and root.
  • Reading archived logs in gz format.
  • Podman, Docker containers and Swarm services logs.
  • Displays the currently selected log (when loading a log, a delimiter with loading time is displayed) and filters output in real-time.

Summary by Sourcery

New Features:

  • Introduce 'lazyjournal', a simple terminal UI for journalctl, file system logs, and Docker/Podman containers, enabling quick viewing and filtering with fuzzy find and regex support in real-time.

Copy link
Contributor

sourcery-ai bot commented Dec 3, 2024

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This PR adds a new entry to the README.md file to include lazyjournal, a terminal-based UI tool for viewing and filtering Linux system logs. The addition follows the existing format of the README, including the open-source software icon and appropriate linking.

No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation.

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Added a new tool entry to the development tools section
  • Added open-source software icon reference
  • Added GitHub repository link
  • Added tool description highlighting key features like journalctl integration, filesystem logs viewing, and container log support
  • Maintained consistent formatting with other entries in the list
README.md

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use
    this command to specify where the summary should be inserted.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

Copy link
Contributor

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @Lifailon - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!

Here's what I looked at during the review
  • 🟢 General issues: all looks good
  • 🟢 Security: all looks good
  • 🟢 Testing: all looks good
  • 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
  • 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant