Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ompl,omplapp] Overhaul #43987

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Feb 25, 2025
Merged

[ompl,omplapp] Overhaul #43987

merged 8 commits into from
Feb 25, 2025

Conversation

dg0yt
Copy link
Contributor

@dg0yt dg0yt commented Feb 23, 2025

Reliably control/disable dependencies.
Update omplapp to 1.6.0, and reuse instead of duplicate ompl. We are aware of the embedding at least since #40151.
Extend ompl CMake config with omplapp targets.
Cleanup.

It is really just at at the edge of "to remove omplapp and add ompl[app] which locks the inner ompl sources at the same value", as suggested by @BillyONeal in #40151 (comment).

Bildschirmfoto vom 2025-02-24 07-40-08

@WangWeiLin-MV WangWeiLin-MV added the category:port-update The issue is with a library, which is requesting update new revision label Feb 24, 2025
@dg0yt dg0yt changed the title [ompl] Overhaul [ompl,omplapp] Overhaul Feb 24, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could it be changed to CMAKE_DISABLE_FIND_PACKAGE_ ?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@dg0yt dg0yt Feb 25, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No. ompl and omplapp rely on extra functions and macros being added by its own FindPython.cmake. This is solved by the noop module vendored into the port.

@WangWeiLin-MV WangWeiLin-MV added the category:port-bug The issue is with a library, which is something the port should already support label Feb 25, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@WangWeiLin-MV WangWeiLin-MV left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The port installation tests pass with the following triplets:

  • x64-linux
  • x64-windows

@WangWeiLin-MV WangWeiLin-MV added the info:reviewed Pull Request changes follow basic guidelines label Feb 25, 2025
@JavierMatosD JavierMatosD merged commit 5908523 into microsoft:master Feb 25, 2025
18 checks passed
pull bot pushed a commit to adamtajti/vcpkg that referenced this pull request Feb 25, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
category:port-bug The issue is with a library, which is something the port should already support category:port-update The issue is with a library, which is requesting update new revision info:reviewed Pull Request changes follow basic guidelines
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants