Common neutrino telescope alert schema #236
Conversation
…Bronze track alerts
0 - initial 1 - update 1 2 - update 2...
| @@ -0,0 +1,44 @@ | |||
| { | |||
| "$id": "https://gcn.nasa.gov/schema/main/gcn/notices/neutrino_telescope/NeutrinoAlert.schema.json", | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Not sure if this should go in core or parallel to missions. We should be consistent with the proposed generic FRB schema (PR #217).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Not tied to this location, please advise. Easy to move now..
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add it as gcn.notices.neutrino.alert.schema.json
|
Please advise on next steps to move this forward, thanks |
|
Hi @blaufuss, we decided to create a template folder alongside the core schema to host generic schema examples. |
|
thanks, Is this already in main? |
Soon will be, see PR: #243 |
I guess template means something. this is just a common unified schema. But I'm ok if that's where it should go. Please advise when this is merged to main and I will update my PR |
Sure, I will let you know. |
|
Hi @blaufuss , we discussed this in the GCN meeting. |
This is done |
| "type": "object", | ||
| "title": "IceCubeGoldAndBronzeTracks", | ||
| "description": "IceCube Astrotrack Gold And Bronze track alert events", | ||
| "allOf": [{ "$ref": "../neutrino/Alert.schema.json" }], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@jracusin and @lpsinger, is it fine to introduce an additional layer of schema?
File gcn/notices/neutrino/Alert.schema.json consists of core schemas (such as Event.schema.json and Alert.schema.json) which are utilized for Icecube... schema.
@blaufuss, this might add an extra layer of complexity for GCN. Since you are producer of gcn/notices/neutrino/Alert.schema.json, we will request your approval for any changes in the core schemas, that would further be notified to the teams using this schema.
We would prefer the direct use of core.schema. I misunderstood it as introducing new neutrino properties or example.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I must admit, I'm a bit confused. If there is a preferred method for implementing this, I'm very open
to suggestions, but I'm not understanding your concerns after the discussions we've had on this
and the month this has been posted.
Is there a better way to move this forward? I'm available to meet and discuss
Description
This PR adds a common GCN alert schema for alerts from neutrino telescopes.
It also reimplements the IceCube Gold/Bronze track alerts using this common schema, with example.
KM3Net will also implement their alerts using this common base schema.
We are happy to move the location of the shared base schema as determined by GCN dev team.