-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix: Selected framework in Code component #12496
Open
gkettani
wants to merge
2
commits into
nextauthjs:main
Choose a base branch
from
gkettani:fix-12451
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this logic is unnecessary because changing the framework in the tabs will automatically update the selected framework, regardless of the active tab or whether you have instances of the page open in different windows on your computer. It will synchronize the updates.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You're correct; that was indeed the case when we used the storageKey prop in the Tabs component. The Tabs component managed the synchronization logic across all tabs.
next-auth/docs/components/Code/index.tsx
Lines 90 to 93 in 9d704a0
However, because the Tabs component relies on an index to track and sync the selected tab, this approach caused the issue we’re addressing.
To resolve this, I extracted the synchronization logic from the Tabs component and adapted it to our use case. During this process, I reviewed the implementation of the Tabs component to understand its behavior and made targeted adjustments to ensure it works properly in our context, specifically by replacing the index-based tracking with framework names.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for your explanation, that makes sense. When you remove the
storageKey
prop fromTabs
, it becomes necessary to configure how the selected value is updated. For this, you’ve used theselectedIndex
prop, which allows changing the selected value. However, by not using thestorageKey
prop, you’ve synchronized the selected value between the tabs of the page using thestorage
event to address the issue. Only the currently active tab updates the value, while the others remain unchanged. This is a great approach to solving the problem!