Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci(conventional_commits): block feat commits for stable7.0 #4319

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 31, 2025

Conversation

hamza221
Copy link
Contributor

@hamza221 hamza221 commented Jan 31, 2025

@hamza221 hamza221 added the 3. to review Waiting for reviews label Jan 31, 2025
@hamza221 hamza221 requested a review from st3iny January 31, 2025 05:52
@hamza221 hamza221 self-assigned this Jan 31, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 31, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 11.13%. Comparing base (703062f) to head (5cafd7a).
Report is 2 commits behind head on stable7.0.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             stable7.0    #4319   +/-   ##
============================================
  Coverage        11.13%   11.13%           
  Complexity         265      265           
============================================
  Files              121      121           
  Lines             5542     5542           
  Branches          1200     1200           
============================================
  Hits               617      617           
  Misses            4803     4803           
  Partials           122      122           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@st3iny st3iny merged commit 308d663 into stable7.0 Jan 31, 2025
34 checks passed
@st3iny st3iny deleted the ci/conventional_commits/stable7.0 branch January 31, 2025 08:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
3. to review Waiting for reviews
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants