-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Relax rules for green tests and introduce markdown format #31
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
10c61e8
to
bd2e16d
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@marusak I'd prefer it if the two changes went into separate PRs. The markdown support looks super straightforward (apart from parts of the code feeling like duplication), so I'd love to get that in asap to enable your team to use this!
@@ -397,8 +415,7 @@ def create_pr_review_queue(pull_request_list): | |||
reviewers = ', '.join(get_slack_userid(requested_reviewer['login']) for requested_reviewer in pull_request['requested_reviewers']) | |||
needs_review.append(f"{entry} {reviewers}") | |||
# 4. Needs conflict resolution or rebasing | |||
elif (not pull_request['changes_requested'] and | |||
(pull_request['mergeable_state'] in {'dirty', 'behind'})): | |||
elif (pull_request['mergeable_state'] in {'dirty', 'behind'}): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I understand and agree with the motivation for this change, but won't this lead to PRs showing up twice on the list?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let's split this into two PRs, one for markdown and one for relaxing the rules
Sent #34 |
No description provided.