Outline the bugfix backport process #1092
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ipanova
reviewed
Nov 29, 2023
README.rst
Outdated
|
|
||
| Since this plugin has been moved to pulpcore, issues can no longer be reported here. Please go to | ||
| `Pulpcore - Issues<https://github.com/pulp/pulpcore/issues>`_ instead. | ||
| Any issues that asrise should also be solved there first and if needed backported to here. We do |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
s/backported to here/backported here
mdellweg
force-pushed
the
doc_transition
branch
from
7f44b13 to
ff12c86
Compare
ggainey
requested changes
Nov 29, 2023
README.rst
Outdated
Comment on lines
20
to
22
| Any issues that arise should also be solved there first and if needed backported to here. We do | ||
| neither expect this to happen soon, nor often. So we will work out the details when / if that | ||
| happens. Please excuse if this takes more time than estimated. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| Any issues that arise should also be solved there first and if needed backported to here. We do | |
| neither expect this to happen soon, nor often. So we will work out the details when / if that | |
| happens. Please excuse if this takes more time than estimated. | |
| Any issues that arise should also be solved there first and if needed backported to here. We expect this to happen only infrequently, if ever. We will therefore work out the details when / if it | |
| happens. Please excuse us if this takes more time than desired. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@ipanova suggested to drop that part. WDYT?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I suggested to drop it because user is not really interested how we solve this and what are our expectations. If there is a case for the backport in this repo we will handle it. That's all he's interested in, imo.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Dropping it sounds good, for exactly @ipanova 's reasoning
[noissue]
mdellweg
force-pushed
the
doc_transition
branch
from
ff12c86 to
d83cdbd
Compare
ipanova
approved these changes
Dec 1, 2023
ggainey
approved these changes
Dec 1, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
[noissue]