Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tiny fix for 2024-03-15-password-reset-vulnerability.md. #181

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 15, 2024
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion _posts/2024-03-15-password-reset-vulnerability.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ Have you ever thrown actual spaghetti at a wall? It’s funny, sticky and barely

Running a bug bounty program means a stream of incoming reports, not all of them correct, that must be reviewed. After receiving enough dire-sounding reports that ultimately lead nowhere, it can look like thrown spaghetti (a see-what-sticks approach). Though we try to give each report a thorough, unbiased evaluation, it’s difficult to keep an open mind about any given report.

Dead-end reports cost the RubyGems security team time, and slow down our ability to address more urgent security issues. I once spent days working on a vulnerability and the result was “clicking that checkbox in BurpSuite invalidates this approach.
Dead-end reports cost the RubyGems security team time, and slow down our ability to address more urgent security issues. I once spent days working on a vulnerability and the result was: _clicking that checkbox in BurpSuite invalidates this approach._

But sometimes a hacker finds a very real security issue. This is a story about a recent bug report that I almost closed, assuming it was another false alarm, and how I realized I was wrong.

Expand Down
Loading