feat: cross-compile static musl binaries for swift #424
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
See #425 for a possible alternate solution |
strophy
force-pushed
the
swift-arm-cross
branch
from
f3c4046 to
f6b2a11
Compare
rvolosatovs
approved these changes
Jan 21, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR enables arm64 builds for Swift, based on the new Swift SDK available with Swift 6.
It would save more space to build dynamically-linked binaries, particularly because an entire Swift runtime is necessary too, meaning we have two copies of the runtime and libraries in the final image.