Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

testing: router benchmark, multiplex external br interfaces on one veth pair #4468

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 26, 2024

Conversation

jiceatscion
Copy link
Contributor

@jiceatscion jiceatscion commented Feb 19, 2024

This makes no difference, performance-wise as each test case uses exactly ones of the external interfaces. However, it reduces the infrastructure required to run benchmarks on real devices: minimum 4 switch ports instead of minimum 6.


This change is Reviewable

This makes no difference, performance-wise as each test case uses exactly
ones of the external interfaces. However, it reduces the infrastructure
required to run benchmarks on real devices: minimum 4 switch ports instead of
minimum 6.
@jiceatscion jiceatscion requested a review from matzf February 19, 2024 17:05
Copy link
Contributor

@matzf matzf left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The representation of this interface grouping in topology information with this exclusive bit does not seem entirely straight forward when reading this. The alternatives do seem just as complex though.

:lgtm:

Reviewed 2 of 2 files at r1, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: :shipit: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @jiceatscion)

@matzf matzf changed the title In router benchmark, multiplex external br interfaces on one veth pair. testing: router benchmark, multiplex external br interfaces on one veth pair Feb 26, 2024
@matzf matzf merged commit 9373c4e into scionproto:master Feb 26, 2024
4 checks passed
@jiceatscion jiceatscion deleted the bm_link_mplex branch February 26, 2024 13:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants