Add storage_root to contracts leaf data #265
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ArielElp
commented
Jan 16, 2025
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reviewed 1 of 1 files at r1, all commit messages.
Reviewable status:complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @ArielElp)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In some usecases, a storage proof for a contract is required without any particular storage keys, e.g. in the case of deployment with no storage updates. The current response structure is missing the contract storage trie root for those cases (it only exists implicitly in the response upon requesting a proof for a specific storage slot).
To remedy this, we add the
storage_rootproperty tocontract_leaves_data.This change is