-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feat/update automation carousel #29
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces modifications to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
apps/mkt/components/automation-carousel/automation-carousel.tsx (1)
Line range hint
49-78
: LGTM! Consistent styling and structure across slides.The carousel items maintain consistent spacing, styling, and semantic structure.
Consider extracting a reusable slide component.
The slides share identical structure and styling patterns. Consider extracting a reusable component to reduce duplication and improve maintainability.
type SlideProps = { bgColor: string; icon: string | React.ReactNode; title: string; description: string; status: 'available' | 'coming-soon'; indicators?: React.ReactNode[]; }; const CarouselSlide: React.FC<SlideProps> = ({ bgColor, icon, title, description, status, indicators }) => ( <div className="rounded-[4px] swiper-slide h-full group/slide"> <div className="border border-dark-400 relative h-full bg-dark-700 rounded-[inherit] z-20 overflow-hidden"> <div className={`${bgColor} flex align-center justify-center text-[80px] py-8 z-20 relative`}> {icon} <Particles className="absolute inset-0 -z-10 opacity-80 transition-opacity duration-500 ease-in-out" quantity={4} refresh={swiperInitialized} rgb="23, 25, 25" /> </div> <div className="flex flex-col p-4 h-full"> <div className="grow"> <div className="font-bold text-lg mb-1 text-zinc-200">{title}</div> <div className="text-dark-200 mb-2">{description}</div> </div> {indicators && ( <div className="flex space-x-1 mb-2"> {indicators} </div> )} <div className={`font-bold ${status === 'available' ? 'text-green-400' : 'text-dark-100'}`}> {status === 'available' ? 'Available' : 'Coming Soon'} </div> </div> </div> </div> );Also applies to: 82-108, 112-139, 142-170, 172-175
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.json
is excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- apps/mkt/components/automation-carousel/automation-carousel.tsx (8 hunks)
- package.json (1 hunks)
- packages/email-templates/package.json (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
packages/email-templates/package.json (2)
19-20
: Clarify relationship to PR objectivesThis dependency change appears unrelated to the stated PR objectives of updating the AutomationCarousel component. Consider:
- Moving this change to a separate PR focused on dependency updates
- Adding context in the PR description explaining why this change is necessary
20-20
:⚠️ Verify the major version downgrade of react-emailThis change downgrades react-email from 2.1.5 to ^1.10.1, which is a major version change that could introduce breaking changes. Please ensure:
- The downgrade is intentional and necessary
- All email templates still work correctly with version 1.x
- There are no compatibility issues with other dependencies (@react-email/[email protected])
Consider:
- Pinning to exact version (1.10.1) instead of using caret (^) to prevent unexpected updates
- Documenting the reason for downgrade in PR description
- Adding integration tests for email templates if not already present
package.json (2)
21-22
: LGTM! Well-structured ngrok configuration.The separation into
_ngrok
andngrok
scripts with environment variable support is a good practice. This approach:
- Improves security by managing sensitive configuration via environment variables
- Enhances maintainability by separating core functionality from environment loading
- Allows for easier reuse in different environments
29-29
: LGTM! Appropriate dependency addition.The addition of
dotenv-cli@^7.4.2
is appropriate for managing environment variables in npm scripts.apps/mkt/components/automation-carousel/automation-carousel.tsx (2)
8-8
: LGTM! Clean icon imports.The addition of Tabler icons maintains consistency across the UI components.
189-189
: LGTM! Clean navigation arrow updates.The SVG paths provide clear directional indicators while maintaining accessibility.
Also applies to: 199-199
This Pull Request improves the AutomationCarousel component by refining the layout and adhering to design standards. We’ve removed extra margins around the Available and Coming Soon labels and replaced inline styles with Tailwind classes for icon sizing, ensuring consistency. These updates make the component cleaner and more maintainable, aligning with the project’s design requirements.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Bug Fixes
Chores
react-email
dependency version for better compatibility.