feat: sync code review requests #39
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces a new database feature for tracking code review requests in a GitHub-integrated application. A new Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
apps/api/src/app/github/services/github-code-review.service.ts (4)
93-96: Ensure error handling for upsert operations
While the calls to fetch and upsert are fine, consider providing more robust error handling for each step to propagate or handle potential GitHub or DB errors gracefully.
119-121: Timeline items logic expansion
Including REVIEW_REQUEST_REMOVED_EVENT here is a solid approach to capture removals. Ensure you have test coverage for both request creation and removal scenarios.
276-326: Implementation of getReviewRequests
• Sorting events by createdAt is logical to handle request→removal order.
• The approach of storing in a Map, then updating deletedAt is straightforward.
Recommendation: Add unit tests for multiple “request→remove→request again” scenarios to ensure correctness.
328-364: Upsert logic with parallel processing
Parallel upserts are efficient. However, if an error occurs in the middle, partial commits might be left behind. Consider either transaction semantics or a fallback strategy if concurrency issues arise.apps/api/prisma/schema.prisma (1)
374-395: New CodeReviewRequest model
• The fields (createdAt, deletedAt, etc.) align well with your domain’s requirements.
• The @unique on (pullRequestId, reviewerId) prevents duplicates.
• The onDelete: Cascade ensures proper cleanup.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
apps/api/prisma/migrations/20241217044750_create_code_review_request_table/migration.sql(1 hunks)apps/api/prisma/schema.prisma(4 hunks)apps/api/src/app/github/services/github-code-review.service.ts(7 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (8)
apps/api/src/app/github/services/github-code-review.service.ts (4)
38-42: Good use of typed interface to capture request details
This dedicated interface improves clarity around what's stored for review requests (createdAt, deletedAt, author).
110-110: Return type extended to include reviewRequests
Great addition to keep the returned data well-structured. Verify that no downstream code relies on the old return type.
208-213: Filtering timeline items
This filter ensures only actual user events (not bots) are processed. Confirm if there's a fallback for non-User reviewers, e.g. teams.
253-253: Exposing reviewRequests
Returning reviewRequests ensures callers can handle them without re-fetching.
apps/api/prisma/migrations/20241217044750_create_code_review_request_table/migration.sql (3)
1-12: Table creation
The table definition is aligned with typical naming conventions. The presence of a deletedAt column is helpful for soft deletes. Check that no foreign key constraints are missing.
14-25: Indexes and uniqueness
Indexing on workspace, reviewer, and pullRequest helps performance. The unique constraint on (pullRequestId, reviewerId) is correct to avoid duplicates.
26-30: RLS policies
RLS enforcement is critical for multi-tenant setups. Great job specifying workspace-based isolation plus a bypass policy.
apps/api/prisma/schema.prisma (1)
99-103: References to CodeReviewRequest
Linking new CodeReviewRequest model to GitProfile, Workspace, and PullRequest ensures smooth relational querying. Validate you have adequate cascading rules.
Also applies to: 158-158, 299-302
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
CodeReviewRequesttable for enhanced tracking of code review requests.Bug Fixes
Documentation