Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

zet: new package #23682

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

zet: new package #23682

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

flosnvjx
Copy link
Contributor

@flosnvjx flosnvjx commented Mar 8, 2025

No description provided.

Copy link
Member

@TomJo2000 TomJo2000 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I can't seem to find a package request for this project.
So I'll just go through an abbreviated version of the package request checklist below really quick.

Packaging policy acknowledgement

  • The project is actively developed.
  • The project has existing packages and is "well known".
  • Licensed under an open source license.
  • Not available through a language package manager: pip, npm, cpan, cargo, etc.
  • Not taking up too much disk space (< 100MiB per architecture, exceptions can be made)
  • Not duplicating the functionality of existing packages.
  • Not serving hacking, malware, phishing, spamming, spying, ddos functionality.
  • I certify that I have read Termux Packaging Policy and understand that my request will be denied if it is found lacking.

In this case I can fine existing packages.
https://repology.org/project/zet/versions
I think we can charitably call that a passing grade on the "existing packages" criteria.
This project explicitly duplicates existing functionality.
But that is less of a dealbreaker.
This might still be a better fit for the TUR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants