Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Deprecate old keycloak and redirect all users to new keycloak #3688

Draft
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

aneta-petrova
Copy link
Member

What changes are you introducing?

  • Deprecating procedures for the Wildfly distribution of Keycloak (all builds)
  • Including procedures for the Quarkus distribution of Keycloak (Satellite only because they are already included in the other builds)

Why are you introducing these changes? (Explanation, links to references, issues, etc.)

Keycloak based on Wildfly itself has been deprecated for a long time.

Anything else to add? (Considerations, potential downsides, alternative solutions you have explored, etc.)

N/A

Checklists

  • I am okay with my commits getting squashed when you merge this PR.
  • I am familiar with the contributing guidelines.

Please cherry-pick my commits into:

  • Foreman 3.14/Katello 4.16
  • Foreman 3.13/Katello 4.15 (EL9 only)
  • Foreman 3.12/Katello 4.14 (Satellite 6.16)
  • Foreman 3.11/Katello 4.13 (orcharhino 6.11 on EL8 only; orcharhino 7.0 on EL8+EL9)
  • Foreman 3.10/Katello 4.12
  • Foreman 3.9/Katello 4.11 (Satellite 6.15; orcharhino 6.8/6.9/6.10)
  • Foreman 3.8/Katello 4.10
  • Foreman 3.7/Katello 4.9 (Satellite 6.14)
  • We do not accept PRs for Foreman older than 3.7.

@github-actions github-actions bot added Needs tech review Requires a review from the technical perspective Needs style review Requires a review from docs style/grammar perspective Needs testing Requires functional testing labels Feb 24, 2025
@aneta-petrova aneta-petrova removed the Needs testing Requires functional testing label Feb 24, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Needs style review Requires a review from docs style/grammar perspective Needs tech review Requires a review from the technical perspective Not yet reviewed
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant