Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Correct date handling for minDate in month selection #1525

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

michaelhenlee
Copy link

@michaelhenlee michaelhenlee commented Jan 23, 2025

Summarize the changes made and the motivation behind them.

Reference related issues using # followed by the issue number.

If there are breaking API changes - like adding or removing props, or changing the structure of the theme - describe them, and provide steps to update existing code.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Improved month selection logic in the Datepicker component to prevent date overflow and ensure correct month button enabling when a minimum date is specified.
    • Updated handling of minimum dates in the "flowbite-react" package for enhanced date selection functionality.

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Jan 23, 2025

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 0a3004c

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
Name Type
flowbite-react Major

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

Copy link

vercel bot commented Jan 23, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
flowbite-react ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Jan 23, 2025 3:19pm
flowbite-react-storybook ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Jan 23, 2025 3:19pm

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 23, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request focuses on enhancing the month selection logic in the DatepickerViewsMonth component. The changes address potential date overflow issues by modifying how the newDate variable is set during month mapping. The new approach ensures accurate month boundary handling, particularly when a minDate is specified, by setting the date to the last day of the selected month. This adjustment improves the component's robustness in date handling without altering its overall structure or functionality.

Changes

File Change Summary
packages/ui/src/components/Datepicker/Views/Months.tsx Modified month date setting logic to prevent overflow and improve minDate handling
.changeset/proud-spoons-joke.md Updated "flowbite-react" package to correct date handling logic related to minDate

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • rluders

Poem

🐰 Hop, hop, through months we dance,
Dates no longer left to chance!
Boundaries fixed with careful might,
Our calendar now shines so bright 📅
A rabbit's code, precise and true! 🗓️


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 020f781 and 0a3004c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .changeset/proud-spoons-joke.md (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.changeset/proud-spoons-joke.md (2)

4-15: LGTM! Well-structured release notes.

The release notes are clear, well-organized, and provide all necessary information about the changes and their impact.


1-3: Consider using a minor version bump instead of major.

The changes fix a bug without introducing breaking changes or requiring migrations. According to semantic versioning, this would typically warrant a minor version bump rather than a major one.

Please confirm if there are any breaking changes that justify a major version bump. If not, consider this diff:

-"flowbite-react": major
+"flowbite-react": minor

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@michaelhenlee
Copy link
Author

@khareemnurulla , I noticed that you worked on this part of the code, and I found an issue when selecting the month. Could you please take a look and provide a review? Thanks!

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
packages/ui/src/components/Datepicker/Views/Months.tsx (1)

42-43: Consider adding year initialization before month manipulation.

While the current implementation works, setting the year before manipulating months would make the code more robust against edge cases.

 const newDate = new Date();
+newDate.setFullYear(viewDate.getFullYear());
 newDate.setMonth(index + 1, 1);
 newDate.setDate(newDate.getDate() - 1);
-newDate.setFullYear(viewDate.getFullYear());
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between bed3c41 and e0252c7.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • packages/ui/src/components/Datepicker/Views/Months.tsx (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
packages/ui/src/components/Datepicker/Views/Months.tsx (1)

40-43: LGTM! Robust solution for handling month boundaries.

The implementation correctly handles the last day of each month, which is crucial for proper minDate validation. The added comments clearly explain the purpose and specific use case.

@michaelhenlee
Copy link
Author

I have attached two videos for review. @khareemnurulla

Before:

bandicam.2025-01-23.08-25-04-650.mp4

After:

bandicam.2025-01-23.08-27-10-196.mp4

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e0252c7 and 020f781.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .changeset/proud-spoons-joke.md (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.changeset/proud-spoons-joke.md (1)

1-3: Consider using a patch version instead of major.

The changes appear to be fixing a bug in date handling without introducing breaking changes to the API. According to semver:

  • Major version: Breaking changes
  • Minor version: New features, non-breaking
  • Patch version: Bug fixes, non-breaking

Since this is a bug fix, a patch version would be more appropriate unless there are breaking changes not mentioned in the PR description.

Could you clarify if there are any breaking changes that warrant a major version bump?

Comment on lines +4 to +5

Correct date handling for minDate in month selection
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Enhance the release notes with more details.

For better maintainability and user communication, please expand the release notes to include:

  • A detailed description of the bug that was fixed
  • The impact on users
  • Any changes in behavior they should expect

Example format:

 Correct date handling for minDate in month selection
+
+## What's Changed
+- Fixed a bug where month selection wasn't respecting minDate constraints
+- Month buttons are now correctly enabled/disabled based on minDate
+
+## Impact
+- Users will see more accurate month selection behavior when minDate is set
+- No breaking changes or migration steps required
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
Correct date handling for minDate in month selection
Correct date handling for minDate in month selection
## What's Changed
- Fixed a bug where month selection wasn't respecting minDate constraints
- Month buttons are now correctly enabled/disabled based on minDate
## Impact
- Users will see more accurate month selection behavior when minDate is set
- No breaking changes or migration steps required

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant