Do DELETE instead of TRUNCATE when locks aren't acquired #7785
+23
−16
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
After compression, the uncompressed part of the chunk is truncated. This requires upgrading the
ExclusiveLock
to anAccessExclusiveLock
and hence is sometimes blocked by other other operations, including reads, on the chunk. This leads to longer compress times or potential deadlocks.Instead of this, we fall back to deleting the tuples in the chunk row-by-row when the upgraded lock isn't immediately acquired.