Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Fix broken links (#161)
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
glenn-jocher authored Jan 27, 2025
1 parent 8964f0c commit cd97168
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 2 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions.
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion docs/en/compare/yolo11-vs-damo-yolo.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ This page provides a detailed technical comparison between two state-of-the-art

**Architecture and Key Features:**

YOLO11's architecture focuses on optimizing the balance between model size and accuracy. Key improvements include enhanced feature extraction layers for more detailed feature capture and a streamlined network structure to reduce computational overhead. This results in models that are not only faster but also more parameter-efficient. The architecture is designed to be flexible, allowing for deployment across diverse platforms, from edge devices like [Raspberry Pi](https://docs.ultralytics.com/guides/raspberry-pi/) and [NVIDIA Jetson](docs.ultralytics.com/guides/nvidia-jetson/) to cloud servers. YOLO11 is also easily integrated with platforms like [Ultralytics HUB](https://www.ultralytics.com/hub) for streamlined training and deployment workflows.
YOLO11's architecture focuses on optimizing the balance between model size and accuracy. Key improvements include enhanced feature extraction layers for more detailed feature capture and a streamlined network structure to reduce computational overhead. This results in models that are not only faster but also more parameter-efficient. The architecture is designed to be flexible, allowing for deployment across diverse platforms, from edge devices like [Raspberry Pi](https://docs.ultralytics.com/guides/raspberry-pi/) and [NVIDIA Jetson](https://docs.ultralytics.com/guides/nvidia-jetson/) to cloud servers. YOLO11 is also easily integrated with platforms like [Ultralytics HUB](https://www.ultralytics.com/hub) for streamlined training and deployment workflows.

**Performance Metrics:**

Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion docs/en/compare/yolov9-vs-damo-yolo.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ The following table provides a comparative overview of the performance metrics f
**YOLOv9 Ideal Use Cases:**

- **Real-time Object Detection**: Applications demanding high-speed processing, such as autonomous driving, robotics, and live video analytics ([AI in self-driving cars](https://www.ultralytics.com/solutions/ai-in-self-driving), [robotics](https://www.ultralytics.com/glossary/robotics)).
- **Edge Devices**: Deployments on resource-constrained devices like [Raspberry Pi](https://docs.ultralytics.com/guides/raspberry-pi/) and [NVIDIA Jetson](docs.ultralytics.com/guides/nvidia-jetson/) where efficiency is paramount.
- **Edge Devices**: Deployments on resource-constrained devices like [Raspberry Pi](https://docs.ultralytics.com/guides/raspberry-pi/) and [NVIDIA Jetson](https://docs.ultralytics.com/guides/nvidia-jetson/) where efficiency is paramount.
- **General Object Detection Tasks**: Versatile for a wide range of object detection tasks due to its balance of speed and accuracy.

**DAMO-YOLO Ideal Use Cases:**
Expand Down

0 comments on commit cd97168

Please sign in to comment.