-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34
Issues: w3c/silver
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Author
Label
Projects
Milestones
Assignee
Sort
Issues list
APCA is very similar to WCAG 2.x contrast with a higher value for ambient light
migration: guidelines
Issues that apply to guidelines
Subgroup: Visual Contrast
Directly Related to Visual Contrast of Text SubGroup
#651
opened Jul 22, 2022 by
xi
Non-normative, passing mention of APCA
bug
Something isn't working with docs
migration: guidelines
Issues that apply to guidelines
Subgroup: Visual Contrast
Directly Related to Visual Contrast of Text SubGroup
#640
opened Jun 14, 2022 by
svgeesus
Rework plain language section of testing section (editor's draft)
only response needed
issues that should be easy to close, acknowledgement only
survey : ready for
proposal or issue response is ready for group review
WCAG 3 Draft Review: Thoughts on Design Principles
survey : ready for
proposal or issue response is ready for group review
WCAG 3 Review: Section 3.1 Text Alternatives - collection of comments
survey : added
in the survey for weekly review in AG and Silver
IBM Comments on WAG 3.0 Draft - Critical errors and revised apporach.
survey : ready for
proposal or issue response is ready for group review
Assess the holistic cost of transition
internal comment
from a participant
survey : ready for
proposal or issue response is ready for group review
WCAG 3.0 Draft Guideline Heading Structure
survey : ready for
proposal or issue response is ready for group review
#599
opened Jan 27, 2022 by
PoornimaSubramanian
Clarify the methodology for verifying APCA’s efficacy
process-question
Subgroup: Visual Contrast
Directly Related to Visual Contrast of Text SubGroup
Recommendation to adjust language in introduction of WCAG 3.0 to go beyond web technology
editorial
Editorial fix that does not affect meaning (typos, formatting, etc)
section: abstract & Intro
survey : ready for
proposal or issue response is ready for group review
Any other term for "Atomic test"?
survey : ready for
proposal or issue response is ready for group review
The proposed conformance arrangements don't support a "zero defects" policy
section: scoring
survey : ready for
proposal or issue response is ready for group review
Conformance WCAG 3: Counting passing issues and documenting may be a poor use of a company's budget
survey : ready for
proposal or issue response is ready for group review
Visual overview of WCAG3 structure
survey : ready for
proposal or issue response is ready for group review
Requesting a minor clarification in definition of Critical error
survey : ready for
proposal or issue response is ready for group review
Typo in latest published WCAG3 draft
editorial
Editorial fix that does not affect meaning (typos, formatting, etc)
survey : ready for
proposal or issue response is ready for group review
#555
opened Sep 17, 2021 by
plannero
Relationship between scoring system and sampling method
survey : ready for
proposal or issue response is ready for group review
Email: Siteimprove Comments on WCAG 3.0 Draft (1 - The proposal fundamentally alters the way in which WCAG is tested)
survey : ready for
proposal or issue response is ready for group review
Email: ACT Comments on WCAG 3.0 Draft
survey : ready for
proposal or issue response is ready for group review
Email: IBM Comments on WCAG 3.0 Draft (10 - Review Process for WCAG 3)
editorial
Editorial fix that does not affect meaning (typos, formatting, etc)
status: revisit during future work
Closed. This is not yet addressed but should be referred to when working on the topic in the future.
survey : ready for
proposal or issue response is ready for group review
#504
opened Mar 19, 2021 by
cwadamsoforacle
Email: IBM Comments on WCAG 3.0 Draft (9 - Requirements)
survey : ready for
proposal or issue response is ready for group review
Email: IBM Comments on WCAG 3.0 Draft (7 - Potential for blockers or delayed adoption of WCAG 3)
survey : ready for
proposal or issue response is ready for group review
Email: IBM Comments on WCAG 3.0 Draft (5 - Usability and understandability of the standard itself)
editorial
Editorial fix that does not affect meaning (typos, formatting, etc)
survey : ready for
proposal or issue response is ready for group review
#499
opened Mar 19, 2021 by
cwadamsoforacle
Previous Next
ProTip!
Adding no:label will show everything without a label.