Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(backburner): add support for garbage limit #175

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 4, 2025

Conversation

thomaslishopline
Copy link
Contributor

@thomaslishopline thomaslishopline commented Jan 24, 2025

  • Added parameter garbage to support configuring GC per forked worker
  • Updated to use rake task instead of cli to run backburner to support configuring GC globally using environment variables

@thomaslishopline thomaslishopline force-pushed the feature/backburner-support-garbage-limit branch from 6ae8a73 to 4f972f9 Compare January 24, 2025 18:01
@@ -56,8 +57,8 @@ workers: []
# percent: 70
# - name: worker1
# queue:
# - queueName: user-import-notification0 # default listener: 2
# - queueName: user-import-notification1 # default listener: 2
# - queueName: user-import-notification0 # default listener: 2, default garbage: ""
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

default listener: 2, garbage: ""

like this?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

updated

@thomaslishopline thomaslishopline force-pushed the feature/backburner-support-garbage-limit branch from 2aa0c0d to e9ad762 Compare February 4, 2025 07:00
@thomaslishopline thomaslishopline merged commit 774dd39 into master Feb 4, 2025
@thomaslishopline thomaslishopline deleted the feature/backburner-support-garbage-limit branch February 4, 2025 07:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants