Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Sends extra config + chainlink-common bump #16247

Draft
wants to merge 23 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 6, 2025

AER Report: CI Core ran successfully ✅

aer_workflow , commit

AER Report: Operator UI CI ran successfully ✅

aer_workflow , commit

@vyzaldysanchez vyzaldysanchez marked this pull request as ready for review February 6, 2025 15:58
@vyzaldysanchez vyzaldysanchez requested review from a team as code owners February 6, 2025 15:58
@vyzaldysanchez vyzaldysanchez requested a review from Atrax1 February 6, 2025 15:58
@vyzaldysanchez
Copy link
Contributor Author

The version used for chainlink-common comes from here, it will be updated on the go.mod file as soon as that PR gets in.

@@ -116,7 +117,7 @@ contractABI = "[\n {\n \"anonymous\": false,\n \"inputs\": [\n {\n

[relayConfig.chainReader.contracts.median.configs]
LatestRoundRequested = "{\n \"chainSpecificName\": \"RoundRequested\",\n \"readType\": \"event\"\n}\n"
LatestTransmissionDetails = "{\n \"chainSpecificName\": \"latestTransmissionDetails\",\n \"outputModifications\": [\n {\n \"Fields\": [\n \"LatestTimestamp_\"\n ],\n \"Type\": \"epoch to time\"\n },\n {\n \"Fields\": {\n \"LatestAnswer_\": \"LatestAnswer\",\n \"LatestTimestamp_\": \"LatestTimestamp\"\n },\n \"Type\": \"rename\"\n }\n ]\n}\n"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why is this changing?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this is a change from updating common to a new version, a change unrelated to what the story is about really, but common has this as part of the bump.

It appears to be a "breaking" change that has not been addressed yet, cause there was no bump to that on core.

@@ -36,7 +38,10 @@ type OracleConfig struct {
MaxQueryLengthBytes uint32
MaxObservationLengthBytes uint32
MaxReportLengthBytes uint32
MaxRequestBatchSize uint32
MaxOutcomeLengthBytes uint32
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

what's going to happen in CLD? we have serialized versions of the existing struct? where is the PR to change that?

please link in Supports section of the PR comment

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There's no PR to CLD just yet, hence why there's a DO_NOT_MERGE label on the PR.

Copy link
Contributor

Flakeguard Summary

Ran new or updated tests between develop and d75ea65 (task/CRE-142/consensus-cap-config).

View Flaky Detector Details | Compare Changes

Found Flaky Tests ❌

1 Results
Name Pass Ratio Panicked? Timed Out? Race? Runs Successes Failures Skips Package Package Panicked? Avg Duration Code Owners
Test_configureOCR3Request_generateOCR3Config 0% false false false 3 0 3 0 github.com/smartcontractkit/chainlink/deployment/keystone/changeset/internal false 0s @smartcontractkit/keystone, @smartcontractkit/core, @smartcontractkit/deployment-automation

Artifacts

For detailed logs of the failed tests, please refer to the artifact failed-test-results-with-logs.json.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants